Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
archive: Buddhist concept of wealth

Buddhist concept of wealth

Sita Arunthavanathan
Daily News, Sri Lanka.
August 27, 1999


    Title: Buddhist concept of wealth
    Author: Sita Arunthavanathan
    Publication: Daily News, Sri Lanka.
    Date: August 27, 1999
    
    Writers of western orientation have levelled accusations against
    Buddhism as a religion responsible for Asian poverty. Except for
    Japan, the other Buddhist counties including Sri Lanka are categorized
    under the term 'suffering from poverty'. They attribute this to the
    teachings of impermanence (anitya) which according to them discourage
    people to engage themselves in lucrative economic pursuits and are
    inclined to take a lackadaisical attitude towards life, become
    unproductive and finally don a yellow robe with the hope of attaining
    Nirvana. Scholars such as Max Weber criticised Buddhism as a religion
    that is supra-mundane, concerned only with the 'blowing out' and
    nothing distinctive for here and now. But Buddhism which starts with
    'dukkha' (suffering) ends with supreme bliss uttaritaram panitataram
    sukham) in this very existence (dittha dhamma sukha).
    
    A study of Buddhism shows that the alluring, beautiful aspect of
    samsaric wanderings is impermanence. If thinking is permanent and
    frozen, then new thought systems would not arise and the psychological
    dynamism in thinking would come to a halt. Buddhism uses impermanence
    as a psychological basis for development - the impossible is made
    possible by impermanence. For example poverty and prosperity are both
    impermanent and hence the sufferings of poverty could be overcome by
    dint of effort (uthana sampada). In the texts we have the story of a
    monk (cullapanthaka who could not learn even one stanza for six
    months, condemned by his own brother Maha Panthaka Thera and advised
    to give up robes. But the Buddha instructed Cullapanthaka to go on
    rubbing his fingers on a piece of clean, white cloth repeating,
    "rajoharanam" - which means 'I am removing the dirt'. After some time
    he observed the cloth becoming dirtier and dirtier with his sweat; he
    reflected on the impurity of the body and impermanence and attained
    Arhathood.
    
    There is ample evidence to prove that from its very inception Buddhism
    was not concerned only with the discipline of the mind but also with
    the material welfare of the laity, who have to shoulder the
    responsibilities of developing the earthly resources for their own
    well-being and also for the sustenance of the monks who are mendicants
    dependent on the laity for their four-fold requisites of robs, arms,
    shelter and medicine. Buddha being a practical leader realized the
    necessity of economic activity and accumulation of wealth.
    
    There are also instances to show that the Buddha had taken a matter of
    fact attitude towards wealth - there is an occasion where he compared
    a bundle of gold coins stolen by the thieves to a serpent. He has also
    remarked that even with a shower  of gold coins, those who enjoy
    worldly pleasures will not be satisfied - "Na kahapa vassesu - titti
    kamesu vijjati" Again, it is said in Samyutta Niakaya that even if
    there is a mountain of gold or even double of that, one single man
    will not be contented.
    
    Nevertheless, the Buddha has declared that poverty is a suffering for
    a householder - 'datiddiyam bhikkhave dukkham'. He once told Brahmin
    Janussoni that wealth is the aim of the householder. The discourses
    reflect the distinctive advice that the Buddha had given on earning
    righteously, spending judiciously and living virtuously with one's
    wealth. The sheet anchor of Buddhist wealth is the acquiring of it by
    righteous means without exploitation of man, material and environment.
    In the Sigalovada Sutta, which is aptly called the Layman's Code of
    Discipline, the Buddha has explained in detail how wealth has to be
    earned. "He who acquires wealth in harmless ways like a bee that
    gathers honey (without harming the flower, its colour or scent),
    riches mount up for him like the rapid growth of the ant-hill. The
    Buddha has shown how wealth has to be spent - that is, one portion for
    his needs, which includes offerings to monks, charity etc. two
    portions on investment and the fourth in case of an emergency. In the
    Vyaggha-pajja Sutta the Buddha says that wealth has to be obtained by
    dint of effort (utthanaviriya gatehi), toiled by strength of arms
    (bahabalapari-citehi), by the  sweat of the brow (sedarakkhitehi) and
    righteously acquired by right means (dhammikehi dhammaladdehi). The
    Sutta further explains what a balanced livelihood is - knowing one's
    income and expenses, lead a balanced life of being neither extravagant
    or miserly, always being conscious of the fact that his income will
    stand in excess  of his
    expenses and never vice versa.
    
    The Buddha explained the righteous means of earning money buy
    recommending five occupations in keeping with right living
    (Sammajiva). They are agriculture (kasi), dairy farming (gorakkha),
    trade (vanijja), serving the king (rajapurisa) and the army
    (issattha). It should be stressed here that the army in the Buddhist
    context is for defence and not for offence. Buddha condemned violence
    of every sort but realized that wars have to be fought in the event of
    invasions and people killed in defence of one's country. Hence the
    terms 'issattha' and 'yodhajeeva' mean living by fighting. If Buddhism
    does not accept this, then it becomes a defeatism.
    
    As much as five kinds of occupations are recommended, the Buddha has
    prohibited five types of trading. They are: 1. 'selling or connected
    with the selling of liquor, 2. flesh, 3. poison (inclusive of drugs),
    4. living beings (for slavery or other purposes) and 5. weapons.' It
    is opportune to mention that the Buddha has banned business activity -
    buying (kraya) and selling (vikraya), for the monks with the comment
    "different is the path of profit-making, from the path of "Nibbana"
    (annahi abhupanissiya anna nibbanagamini). These words were uttered by
    the Buddha when a young monk ran away from all the gifts showered on
    him. The underlying idea is that if too many gifts are offered to
    monks there will be a tendency towards business. 
    
    There are discourses (Cakkavatti sihanada sutta) for example which
    show that mal-distribution of wealth is a social evil that paves the
    way to crime and revolution. Buddhism has very healthy attitude
    towards money and money-making but does not approve hoarding; spending
    one's entire time on earning and not enjoying what one earns is not
    the Buddhist ideal. The term 'agahito' occurring in the texts means 
    that when handling money one should not be trapped by it or tied down
    to it. In other words one can possess money but not be possessed by
    it. The term 'anuchito' means not to lose one's senses in handling
    money and let it blunt your Right Mindfulness (Samma sati).The other
    term 'adinavadassani ' warns one to realize the dangers linked with
    money; in short that money is a good servant but a bad master. The
    Buddha once preached to a village headman that different people earn
    money in different  ways and he hailed as ideal the one who "seeks
    riches through just means but not through violence....he makes himself
    comfortable and satisfies himself, he divides the riches and gathers
    merit; he enjoys the riches without clinging to them, without being
    stupefied by them, without any guilty feelings being conscious of the
    danger lurking in them and their consequences."
    
    To illustrate further how to earn and spend righteously, how to
    control wealth and eradicate craving (tanha), the Buddha has explained
    four kinds of happiness. First is Atthi Sukha the happiness one gets
    by the genuine feeling that the wealth he has  is earned without
    corruption, exploitation, robbing or harming anyone. Second, Bhhoga
    sukha is the happiness derived from the feeling that money is utilized
    meaningfully, sharing and enjoying according to the Buddhist ideal.
    Overcome with wealth one should not cultivate unhealthy habits or
    indulge in more and more sensual pleasures, consuming all kinds of
    food (batta mada) and drinks. He has to perform five kinds of duties
    or 'bali' ttowardss relatiions (nati bali) visitors (atithi bali)
    departed ones (pubbapet bali) gods (devata bali) and the king (raja
    bali). The last mentioned is income tax in modern parlance. Anana
    Sukha, the third happiness is the feeling that one owes no money to
    anyone and the last, Anarajja Sukha is the happiness derived by
    reflecting that the wealth one possesses is flawless and blameless so
    that no  one could point a finger and say that the wealth and luxuries
    enjoyed by him, his wife and children are ill-gotten.
    
    Buddhism is totally opposed to industrialism with its unremitting,
    avaricious and unscrupulous struggle for wealth. Unrestrained greed
    for the pursuit of wealth has generated a perfect callousness for
    human feelings. Herbert Spencer describes in  his book Social Statics,
    how wealth and property are acquired by, "violence, fraud, the
    prerogatives of force, the claims of superior cunning..." which
    according to Buddhist concept of wealth is thieving (adinnadana). The
    Buddhist ideal is corporate labour by which noble human qualities such
    as compassion (metta), loving kindness (karuna) magnanimity and
    selflessness would help to undermine the overwhelming greed for
    relentless accumulation and amassing of wealth and promote
    satisfaction with a few wants. (alpecchata). According to Buddhism the
    greatest wealth is contentment (santutthi paramam dhanam);; then,
    reaping of wealth by raping natural resources, non-renewable resources
    and exploitation of man, material and environment will be minimised.
    Those who amass wealth should realize that wealth like everything else
    - not to mention life - is impermanent and we do not carry it to the
    other side.  This episode from Samyutta Nikaya sums up the Buddhist
    concept of wealth and its lofty ideals of righteous earning and
    virtuous living. Sakra, the King of Gods, was being driven about in
    Tusita Heaven by his charioteer Matali when the latter observed that
    Sakra got up from his seat and with clasped hands bent his head to
    certain spots on earth. When Matali questioned the Sakra as to what he
    was doing the reply
    was:
    
    Ye gahattha punnakara - silavanta upasaka
    
    Dhammena dharam posenti - tam namassami Matali
    
    'O Matali, I salute with my clasped hands those merit-loving virtuous
    householders who maintain and nourish their wives and children with
    wealth gotten righteously.'
    



Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements