Christians oppose Govt move to present marriage bill
Christians oppose Govt move to present marriage bill
Author: United News
Of India
Publication: The Indian
Express
Date: May 2, 2000
The Christian community
on Monday strongly opposed the Government's move to introduce the Christians
Marriage Bill 2000 in Parliament in its present form.
Leaders of the Catholics
Bishops' Conference of India (CBCI) and the National Council of Churches
in India (NCCI) addressing a joint press conference here said they had
proposed certain changes in the draft before taking it to Parliament and
had handed over to Law Minister Ram Jethmalani written suggestions covering
various modifications that the Christian community had sought.
Delhi archbishop Alan
de Lastic said the Draft Bill withdraws important freedoms historically
enjoyed by Christians. Hitherto marriages could solemnised in the church
when one party was a Christian and both wanted to wed in church. This right
has been taken away. The new Bill restricts church marriages only when
both partners are Christians and forces mixed couples to go for a marriage
under the special marriage act.
Also under the new bill
severe restrictions have been placed on priests performing marriages in
church with penalties for violations of regulations going up to ten years
in prison and fines.
Describing the Bill as
part of the hostile activity against the church the archbishop apprehended
that the punitive provisions could be misused. He demanded that personal
laws of the minorities should not be interfered with and if needed, any
amendments be done in consultation with and on the appeal of the minorities
only.
The archbishop said they
had waited for the Government response to the Bill for three years but
the Government had now "rushed into it" and given them only about ten days
to consider. They suspected some design behind the Government's hurried
move to present the Bill before Parliament.
He said they had asked
for an appointment with Jethmalani to explain to him their point of view.
The Law Minister had
convened a meeting of church leaders and several other organisations on
April 28 to discuss the Christian Marriage Bill, 1994, prepared by the
JWP and the ecumenical committee for changes in Christian marriage law.
He reportedly told those attending the meeting that he would introduce
the Christian Marriages Bill 2000 in the current session of Parliament.
The draft Christian Marriage
Bill, 2000, supports the proposal made by the JWP Bill 1994. It strikes
down Section 10 of the Divorce Act 1969, removes the clause on minor marriages
in Christian Marriage Act 1972, provides for right to matrimonial home
in the case of divorce and also provides for divorce by mutual consent.
"We felt very happy when
the Law Minister gave indication that the Government was willing to introduce
the legislation we sought....upon examining the draft bill we found several
major shortcomings in the draft bill which we pointed out during the meeting.
We strongly urged the government that the draft bill could not be introduced
in Parliament in its present form."
Archbishop de Lastic,
who is also president of the CBCI, said the Bill seeks to describe "marriage
as a contract while as marriage is something sacred. The bill also tends
to liberate divorce which is clearly discriminatory".
Rev Oswald Gracias, general
secretary of the CBCI, who was also at the press conference, said their
criticism of the Bill in the present form should not be misunderstood as
the Christians blocking an important piece of legislation. "In fact we
only want certain amendments in the Bill in its present form before it
goes to Members of Parliament," he added.
The two leaders said
the church in India had been demanding for a long time a new legislation
to replace the existing four acts on marriage, divorce, adoption and succession.
Some of these laws date back to the 19th century. After intensive discussions
within the Christian community, drafts of four bills were submitted to
the Government about 12 years ago. Since then successive governments were
requested to expedite the bills.
Back
Top
|