Title:
BJP’s Finest Hour
Author:
Swapan Dasgupta
Publication:
India Today
Date:
February 10, 2003
Introduction:
The Mood of the Nation poll points to a decisive victory for the BJP-led alliance
in the event of a snap poll. What explains this dramatic turnaround and the
total decimation of the Congress?
Among
the unwritten rules governing contemporary Indian politics-at least for the
past three decades-is that a government loses its way midstream and becomes
vulnerable to a rising tide of anti-incumbency. Till a year ago, this seemed
to be the predestined fate of the Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led NDA Government.
The BJP and its allies were worsted in the key assembly elections of Uttar
Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Punjab and Uttaranchal. The Congress under Sonia Gandhi
was staging a dramatic comeback.
Fortunately
for Vajpayee, democracy is not governed by the laws of inevitability. Since
the Godhra carnage in February last year and its bloody aftermath in Gujarat,
the BJP appears to have rediscovered itself. A narrow win in Goa and a resounding
triumph in Gujarat have set the stage for a wider recovery. Last week, as
if to drive home the point, Vajpayee effected a Cabinet reshuffle with an
eye to the next round of assembly polls. The talk of a snap poll any time
between October and February next year is doing the rounds.
The
country's most exhaustive political tracker, the India Today- ORG-MARG Mood
of the Nation poll last August (it, August 26, 2002) detected the first signs
of the anti- incumbency tide being rolled back. Nearly six months later, the
trend has crystallised quite dramatically. The January 2003 Mood of the Nation
poll suggests that the popular vote for the NDA may touch 42 per cent, giving
the ruling coalition a clear majority of between 310 and 320 seats in the
event of a snap poll. If the BJP and the BSP strike a poll alliance in Uttar
Pradesh, the NDA tally may even reach 340.
On
the face of it, the shifts are small. In just 12 months, the BJP and its allies
have gained an extra 0.8 per cent votes; in the same period the Congress combine
has lost 2 per cent votes. Today, the ruling combine has 0.2 per cent more
votes than 1999 and the Congress-led alliance 0.1 per cent less. Yet these
small shifts are enough to increase the NDA majority remarkably from 32 to
48. If the BJP continues its advance even modestly, the outcome could be a
landslide.
Most
heartening for the BJP is that the surge is most marked in its traditional
strongholds and, particularly, in the Hindi-heartland states where assembly
elections are due later this year. The opinion poll suggests that the BJP
is comfortably ahead of the Congress in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh
and Delhi. It has recovered its position in Jharkhand and is on a roll in
Assam. Together with its allies, it is also well placed in Orissa and Haryana.
However,
the BJP is still nowhere close to realising its party President M. Venkaiah
Naidu's dream of winning 300 seats on its own. The improvement in its support
is still concentrated in its traditional areas where it is almost reaching
saturation point. The BJP has to perform much better in states like Uttar
Pradesh, Karnataka, Punjab and Bihar before it can increase its tally.
Reeling
from the after-effects of Gujarat, the Congress seems to be in a state of
disarray. According to the poll, the Congress and its allies (for the purposes
of consistency, it includes the AIADMK in Tamil Nadu) will lose nearly 25
seats, thereby shrinking their 1999 tally further. This means that the Congress
will actually be reduced to double digits and descend to an all-time low.
Apart from Karnataka, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh, Punjab and Uttaranchal where
it is holding, the Congress has lost ground in the past 12 months.
What
in shorthand is often referred to as Moditva or the Gujarat effect has played
an important role in shoring up the BJP's support. As much as 43 per cent
nationally-a very high figure-is elated over the Gujarat verdict. Yet, reduced
to specifics, the jubilation is concentrated in the North (48 per cent), the
West (46 per cent) and the youth. In other words, Moditva has galvanised the
party in its core areas and even energised it. Read with the pattern of support
for the construction of a Ram temple in Ayodhya and the support for a law
to ban religious conversions (another VHP demand), they suggest that the BJP
would find it difficult to abandon the Hindutva tag during any future election
campaign.
In
Gujarat, a militant Hindutva was tagged with a hardline stand on national
security and terrorism. The poll suggests that the importance of these as
top-of-the-mind issues has diminished over the past year. In other words,
unless war clouds intervene or terrorists strike in a dramatic way, jingoistic
rhetoric will not determine the way people vote. However, if Pakistan and
terrorism return to the political agenda-and this may well happen in the event
of a war in Iraq leading to wider Islamic unrest-the BJP's shrillness would
correspond with popular thinking. The poll shows quite clearly that those
who support the BJP and other NDA parties are significantly more likely to
be swayed by anti-Pakistan rhetoric than those who support the Congress. National
security and anti-terrorism have come to be more closely identified with the
BJP than with the Congress. For a party that once screamed about the "foreign
hand" from rooftops, this amounts to losing an important political plank.
At
the same time it is intriguing that despite the BJP being on the right side
of an emerging ideological mood, Vajpayee's own popularity has not increased.
There is a significant rise in his performance ratings but no corresponding
rise in those who perceive him as the prime minister of their choice. This
mismatch is significant. It suggests that unlike in 1999, Vajpayee's ability
to secure an incremental vote for the NDA has diminished. Today, but not for
the first time, the combined vote tally of the NDA exceeds the prime minister's
own popularity. At the same time, it is significantly more than the support
for the BJP. This implies that Vajpayee's indispensability persists, less
as an inspiration and more as a reassuring coalition-builder.
This
leads on to what is perhaps the most interesting finding of the poll. If the
appeal of Hindutva is confined to the BJP's core areas-which has, of course,
expanded in the past two decades-and Vajpayee's popularity is static, what
has helped the NDA to cling to its 1999 vote?
The
answer lies in a combination of performance and hope. The poll show a small
(3 per cent) rise in the number of those who feel they are better off and
an equally small (2 per cent) decline in those who think they are worse off.
At the same time there is a jump, from 21 per cent in August 2002 to 27 per
cent now, of those who think they will be better off in the next six months.
Likewise, the corresponding figure of those who believe they will be worse
off has fallen from 24 per cent in August 2002 to 21 per cent. Curiously,
the expectation of better times is most marked in poor states like Bihar,
Uttar Pradesh, Uttaranchal and Jharkhand.
A
discernible feel-good mood is complemented by a feeling that there has been
an all-round improvement in services where the Centre has a role to play.
Good roads and better telephones-solid middle-class issues-are paying dividends.
Good governance or su-raj may still be a distant dream but the NDA can at
least hope to benefit from a visible improvement in living standards.
As
the next general election, due before October 2004, draws nearer, the Vajpayee
Government will firm up its strategy. The fine-tuning will depend on political
exigencies but Vajpayee is certain to be comforted by the knowledge that he
starts with the advantage of an energised support. And without an anti-incumbency
mood to counter.
Which
party will you vote for? |
||
Lok
Sabha Projections |
Total
Seats - 543 |
|
|
||
BJP+(TDP,
JD(U), INLD, Shiv Sena, BJD, DMK, PMK, MDMK, Samata, TMC, SAD) |
||
Poll
Jan 2003 |
Seats
310-320 |
Vote%
41.9 |
Poll
Aug 202 |
245-255 |
41.3 |
Poll
Jan 2002 |
260-270 |
41.1 |
Actual
1999 |
304 |
41.1 |
Swing |
0.2 Over
1999 |
0.6 Over
Aug ‘02 |
|
||
Cong+(RJD,
Kerala Congress (Mani), RPI, AIADMK, IUML, RLD) |
||
Poll
Jan 2003 |
Seats
110-120 |
Vote% 36.8 |
Poll
Aug 202 |
190-200 |
39.3 |
Poll
Jan 2002 |
155-165 |
38.8 |
Actual
1999 |
140 |
36.9 |
Swing |
-0.1 Over
1999 |
-2.5 Over
Aug ‘02 |
|
||
Others
(Primarily Left Front, NCP, Samajwadi Party and BSP) |
||
Poll
Jan 2003 |
Seats
110-120 |
Vote% 21.3 |
Poll
Aug 202 |
95-105 |
19.6 |
Poll
Jan 2002 |
110-120 |
20.3 |
Actual
1999 |
99 |
21.5 |
Swing |
-0.2 Over
1999 |
1.7 Over
Aug ‘02 |
REGIONAL
BREAK - UP
NORTH
Total
seats: 151 |
|||
|
BJP+Allies |
Cong+Allies |
Others |
January
2003 |
75-85 |
25-35 |
34-45 |
August
2002 |
50-60 |
45-55 |
45-55 |
January
2002 |
56-64 |
32-40 |
51-58 |
Actual
1999 |
80 |
30 |
41 |
SOUTH Total
seats: 132 |
|||
|
BJP+Allies |
Cong+Allies |
Others |
January
2003 |
68-78 |
35-45 |
17-23 |
August
2002 |
65-75 |
55-65 |
0-5 |
January
2002 |
72-80 |
42-50 |
8-12 |
Actual
1999 |
73 |
49 |
10 |
EAST
Total
seats: 142 |
|||
|
BJP+Allies |
Cong+Allies |
Others |
January
2003 |
68-78 |
20-30 |
40-50 |
August
2002 |
55-65 |
35-45 |
35-45 |
January
2002 |
61-69 |
35-43 |
35-43 |
Actual
1999 |
72 |
32 |
38 |
WEST Total
seats: 118 |
|||
|
BJP+Allies |
Cong+Allies |
Others |
January
2003 |
83-93 |
15-25 |
8-12 |
August
2002 |
60-70 |
35-45 |
7-12 |
January
2002 |
62-70 |
37-45 |
8-12 |
Actual
1999 |
79 |
29 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
North:
Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh South:
Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Kerala East:
Assam, Bihar, Orissa and West Bengal West:
Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh |
In
the past two years, the quality of life... |
||||
|
|
|
Aug
2002 |
Jan
2002 |
Has
become better |
|
20 |
17 |
22 |
Has
become worse |
|
24 |
26 |
24 |
Remained
the same |
|
55 |
57 |
54 |
All
figures in per cent. Rest: Don't know/Can't say |
Which
issue are you most concerned about? |
||||
|
|
|
Aug
2002 |
Jan
2002 |
Unemployment |
|
39 |
38 |
32 |
Rising
Prices |
|
37 |
38 |
38 |
Government
corruption |
|
10 |
10 |
10 |
Law
and order |
|
5 |
4 |
4 |
Stability
of Centre |
|
2 |
2 |
3 |
Religious
and caste issues |
|
3 |
3 |
2 |
National
security |
|
4 |
5 |
10 |
The
national mood is highly uneven. A sense of relative prosperity in
the North and the West is offset by dejection in the East and the
South |
Who
is your choice for prime minister of India |
||||
|
|
|
Aug
2002 |
Jan
2002 |
A.B.
Vajpayee |
|
34 |
33 |
28 |
Sonia
Gandhi |
|
19 |
20 |
19 |
L.K.
Advani |
|
4 |
|
|
Mulayam
Singh |
|
3 |
|
|
Sharad
Pawar |
|
2 |
|
|
Mayawati |
|
2 |
|
|
All
figures in per cent. Rest: Don't know/Can't say |
||||
Sonia
Gandhi's popularity seems to have plateaued even as Vajpayee's has
not improved markedly. For the second consecutive poll, the leadership
ratings of the contenders for the top job lag behind the vote share
of their formations. If this trend persists, it would mean that the
next election may not be as presidential as 1999. If inspiration is
indeed at a discount, ideology, performance and identity will assume
greater importance. Yet, keep in mind that in moments of crisis Vajpayee's
ratings improve sharply. |
Methodology
and Findings
-Vivek
Kumar, Research Director, ORG-MARG
The
Mood of the Nation poll covered a
total of 17,653 interviews among eligible voters spread across 98 parliamentary
constituencies. The sample was spread over urban/rural, male/female and age
groups. The assembly constituencies were sampled on the stratified systematic
random sampling basis. Within a selected assembly constituency, house-to-house,
face-to-face interviews were done on the basis of quotas using the right-hand
rule of field movement. Our salient findings are:
The
BJP alliance is expected to get 310-320 seats. There are major gains for the
party in the West.
Unemployment
continues to be the issue that causes the most concern (39 per cent) and surpasses
rising prices (37 per cent) in this respect as compared to August 2002 when
both issues were at par. The criticality of unemployment is particularly high
in the North and the East. Rising prices are more important in southern states
like Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Tamil Nadu and in Gujarat and Orissa.
The
Congress and the BJP are almost neck-to- neck in perceptions of being the
best party to solve the country's problems.
Performance
of the current prime minister is rated as average to good by a majority. Performance
of the current Central Government is also rated as average to good by 67 per
cent.
Nearly
44 per cent expect status quo on own economic front. However, 27 per cent
are optimistic and expect to be better off-an increase as compared to the
previous round where only 21 per cent expected to be better off.
A
hard-line military solution to the problem of terrorism in Kashmir is favoured
by 37 per cent. About 23 per cent endorse a policy of discussions and talks
with Pakistan. This is in line with the position in August 2002. However,
the segment looking for negotiations to solve the problem has risen from 18
per cent to 23 per cent.
Building
a Ram temple at the disputed site is the way to resolve the Ayodhya problem
according to 39 per cent of the respondents. The segment favouring this solution
has gone down as compared to August 2002.
Narendra
Modi's victory in Gujarat has been appreciated by a majority (43 per cent).
A perceptible shift in position is seen from August 2002 when 34 per cent
felt that the Modi government should have been dismissed after the riots.
Largely
favourable perceptions of the performance of all public services-sizeable
sections feel that they have improved. Somewhat ambivalent view on garbage
collection-30 per cent feel it has improved, 27 per cent feel it has deteriorated
and another 30 per cent feel that it has remained the same.
Rate
the performance of the primeminister |
||||
Good |
Outstanding |
DK/CS |
Poor |
Average |
40 |
9 |
12 |
11 |
28 |
Net
Approval Rating: 38 |
||||
|
||||
Good |
Outstanding |
DK/CS |
Poor |
Average |
37 |
8 |
11 |
14 |
30 |
Net
Approval Rating: 31 |
||||
Net
Approval Rating in per cent calculated by deducting negative ratings
from positive. DK/CS: Don’t Know/Can’t say. |
||||
Although
Vajpayee's standing in the prime ministerial sweepstakes has remained
constant, he has begun to score in terms of performance. The past
six months have seen his Net Approval Rating (NAR) soaring by seven
points. Indeed, his NAR is now three points higher than it was in
January 2002, in the aftermath of the attack on Parliament. In electoral
terms, this means that the BJP and allies are not seriously burdened
by an anti-incumbency mood-the mid-term curse for all governments.
More to the point, Vajpayee's NAR is high in many of the Congress-ruled
states. This augurs well for the BJP. What should, however, be of
concern is that in Andhra Pradesh, Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, the prime
minister is not seen to the performing. Fortunately for the BJP, the
Congress is not in a position to take advantage in two of the three
states. |
Who
is the best leader for the Congress is Sonia is replaced? |
|
Cong
Voters |
Aug
2002 |
Cong
Voters |
Priyanka
Gandhi |
24 |
26 |
24 |
30 |
Manmohan
Singh |
14 |
13 |
11 |
4 |
Rahul
Gandhi |
11 |
12 |
11 |
3 |
Digvijay
Singh |
3 |
3 |
3 |
3 |
Others |
8 |
- |
- |
- |
All
figures in per cent. Rest: Don't know/Can't say |
||||
Congress
remains a party decisively wedded to dynasty. Priyanka is the favoured
successor to Sonia and non-Gandhis hardly get a look in. |
Who
is the best leader for the NDA if Vajpayee is replaced? |
|
BJP
Voters |
Aug
2002 |
BJP
Voters |
L.K.
Advani |
33 |
41 |
33 |
39 |
Susma
Swaraj |
8 |
7 |
3 |
3 |
Jaswant
Singh |
3 |
2 |
4 |
3 |
M.M.
Joshi |
|
|
2 |
2 |
Narendra
Modi |
|
|
2 |
3 |
Others |
|
|
7 |
|
All
figures in per cent. Rest: Don't know/Can't say |
||||
After
three polls, it is clear Advani is the acknowledged successor to Vajpayee.
However, in the Generation Next battle, Swaraj has taken a lead and
Modi has made it to the national stage. |
What
is your perception of Pakistan? |
|
BJP+ |
Cong+ |
Aug
2002 |
An
enemy |
66 |
70 |
61 |
68 |
Separated
brother |
12 |
10 |
14 |
9 |
Friend |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
Future
ally |
4 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
Don't
know/Can't say |
12 |
10 |
15 |
14 |
No compromise
with Pakistan is the clear national consensus. Supporters of the BJP
are more equivocal on this than Congress supporters. The support of
its vote bank allows Vajpayee to pursue a hard-line agenda. It also
means the Congress is on the defensive in trying to be accommodating. |
What
is the main cause of terrorism in India? |
|
BJP+ |
Cong+ |
|
Encouragement
by Pakistan |
41 |
45 |
38 |
|
The
Kashmir problem |
16 |
16 |
15 |
|
Global
Jehadi movement |
4 |
4 |
5 |
|
Poverty
and lack of opportunities |
13 |
12 |
14 |
|
Extremist
Hindu groups |
2 |
2 |
2 |
|
How
do you feel about Modi's victory in Gujarat? |
||||
Happy |
43 |
|
|
|
unhappy |
12 |
|
|
|
Neither |
16 |
|
|
|
Don't
know/Can't say |
29 |
|
|
|
SIX
STATES HIGH ON MODITVA |
|||||
Delhi |
Gujarat |
MP |
Punjab |
Karnataka |
Maharashtra |
Poll
shows educated Hindus are enthused by Gujarat. |
Home
turf of Modi is enjoying its national fame. |
Congress
is trying out outdo the BJP in its Hindutva. |
Gujarat
verdict drew cheers from Sikhs. |
Hi-tech
and the southern bastion of Hindutva. |
Mood
seems to favour a Sena-BJP revival. |
Moditva
Negative: KERALA |
Few
assembly elections have attracted as much national attention as last
December's Gujarat poll. Narendra Modi's conclusive victory brought
about a dramatic change in the popular mood. In the August 2002 poll,
34 per cent felt that Modi should have been dismissed for his handling
of the riots and 28 per cent opposed the suggestion. Now, 43 per cent
are happy with the Gujarat outcome. In social terms, Moditva seems
to have touched a chord in many circles. The strongest endorsement
comes from those with medium and high education (50 per cent and 60
per cent respectively) and the 18 to 24-year-old youth (48 per cent).
Adding a curious twist is the 60 per cent endorsement of Sikhs. |
Solutions
to Ayodhya.... |
|
Hindus |
Muslim |
Aug
2002 |
Temple
to be built immediately |
39 |
44 |
8 |
47 |
Courts
to resolve matters |
18 |
17 |
25 |
21 |
Government
to initiate dialoge |
17 |
16 |
26 |
16 |
Status
quo to be maintained |
7 |
7 |
15 |
4 |
Masjid
to be rebuilt |
4 |
3 |
12 |
4 |
All
figures in per cent. Rest: Don't know/Can't say |
||||
With
the movement dormant for a year, support for a Ram temple in Ayodhya
has fallen by 6 per cent since last August. Yet, this remains the
preferred solution of Hindus. More important, this is an issue where
only 15 per cent don't have a view. |
Should
the Government ban religious conversions? |
||
Yes |
No |
Don’t know/Can’t say |
54 |
36 |
10 |
Should PSUs be
privatised? |
|
Yes |
No |
35 |
48 |
Willingness
to have member of another community as neighbour |
|
Urban |
Rural |
|
Yes |
|
63 |
73 |
60 |
No |
|
31 |
23 |
34 |
DK/CS |
|
6 |
4 |
6 |
This
is a poser that tests the extent of communal polarisation. The findings
suggest that multi-religious societies that are not prone to communal
riots are also the most ghettoised. There is also a greater sense
of segregation in rural India. Not a happy message for national integration. |
The
quality of these public services has... |
Improved |
Deterio- |
Same |
DK/CS |
Railways |
55 |
14 |
17 |
14 |
Telephone |
73 |
7 |
9 |
11 |
Mobile
telephone |
58 |
6 |
9 |
27 |
LPG |
62 |
12 |
12 |
14 |
School
education |
62 |
19 |
15 |
4 |
Roads |
55 |
25 |
17 |
3 |
Drinking
Water |
47 |
27 |
23 |
3 |
Housing |
43 |
20 |
28 |
9 |
Garbage
Collection |
30 |
27 |
30 |
13 |
Local
Transport |
63 |
12 |
18 |
7 |
All
figures in per cent. Rest: Don't know/Can't say |
Rate
the popularity of the chief minister... |
|
Aug
2002 |
Jan
2002 |
Aug
2001 |
N.D.
Tiwari |
51 |
58 |
|
|
Sheila
Dkshit |
48 |
4 |
38 |
7 |
Babulal
Marandi |
45 |
-8 |
|
|
Vilasrao
Deshmukh (Maharashtra) |
39 |
28 |
29 |
33 |
Narendra
Modi (Gujarat) |
37 |
45 |
22 |
|
Buddhadeb
Bhattacharya (W. Bengal) |
36 |
45 |
35 |
33 |
Naveen
Patnaik (Orissa) |
32 |
42 |
24 |
26 |
Tarun
Gogoi (Assam) |
30 |
9 |
43 |
40 |
N.Chandrababu
Naidu (A.P.) |
26 |
3 |
15 |
7 |
Ajit
Jogi (chhattisgarh) |
14 |
27 |
|
|
Ashok
Gehlot (Rajasthan) |
14 |
20 |
8 |
4 |
Mayawati
(Uttar Pradesh) |
13 |
27 |
|
|
O.P.
Chautala (Haryana) |
12 |
-38 |
-19 |
-18 |
Digvijay
Singh (MP) |
10 |
9 |
3 |
14 |
Amarinder
Singh (Punjab) |
4 |
28 |
|
|
S.M.
Krishna (Karnataka) |
-3 |
18 |
43 |
42 |
A.K.
Antony (Kerala) |
-8 |
-21 |
-19 |
-5 |
Rabri
Devi (Bihar) |
-17 |
-24 |
|
-13 |
J.
Jayalalithaa (Tamil Nadu) |
-41 |
-24 |
|
|
All
figures in per cent. Rest: Don't know/Can't say |
||||
If
national trends are bereft of wild fluctuations, state findings suggest
the complete opposite. State politics being of more immediate concern,
the performance of chief ministers is more closely measured by voters.
Karnataka Chief Minister S.M. Krishna who topped the popularity ratings
in August 2001 and January 2002 now finds himself down in the dumps.
But there are others like West Bengal's Buddhadeb Bhattacharya, Orissa's
Naveen Patnaik and Gujarat's Narendra Modi who have performed consistently
well. Finally, there are those like Tamil Nadu's J. Jayalalithaa and
Kerala's A.K. Antony who always get negative ratings. This is because
passionate support for them is invariably offset by an equally passionate
dislike-a function of intense polarisation. And the support for Bihar's
Rabri Devi isn't measured by governance. |