Hindu Vivek Kendra
«« Back
Obama the Fool

Obama the Fool

Author: Kenyon J. Hull
Publication: Faithfreedom.org
Date: June 6, 2009
URL: http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/06/06/obama-the-fool/

Early in his speech in Cairo BHO mentioned "centuries of co-existence and cooperation." When and where? For 1400 years, Islam has waged jihad against all civilizations including Western Civilization. The history of Islam from Arabia was followed by the rapid conquest of North Africa and invasion and conquest of Spain, and a thrust into France that carried the crescent to the gates of Paris. It took half a millennium of reconquest to expel Islam from Western Europe.

O mentions "tensions fed by colonialism; a Cold War where Muslims were treated as proxies; change brought by modernity and globalization which led many Muslims to view the West as hostile to…Islam." BHO lists ways the West has mistreated Islam. Not a word about the jihad doctrine, not a word about Islamic supremism and the imperative to make war against and subjugate non-Muslims. Not a word about the culture of hatred and contempt for non-Muslims that existed long before the spread of American culture.

O says, "Violent extremists….have bred more fear and mistrust." The idea that jihadists are a small minority is universally accepted dogma. However, all Muslims are commanded by the Quran to be jihadists. Sura 47: Whenever you encounter the ones who disbelieve (during wartime) seize them by their necks, until once you have subdued them

then tie them up as prisoners, either in order to release them later on, or else to ask for ransom, until war lays down her burdens.

Also, the attacks of September 11, 2001 and continued efforts of these extremists to engage in violence against civilians has American and Western countries viewing Islam as hostile to their existence. It is also Islamic texts and teachings that inspired these attacks that also fuel these perceptions.

O says, "The first nation to recognize my country was Morocco…in the signing of the Treaty of Tripoli in 1796." A very clever half truth. The treaty was drawn up in an attempt to put an end to raids on American shipping by Barbary Coast pirates. Tripoli was a Muslim stronghold used as a base of operations for the pirates who habitually preyed upon our shipping and enslavement of our seamen. Piracy, kidnapping and enslavement of our seamen remained a problem despite the Treaty of 1796. Also, Tripoli demanded increased tribute payment in 1801. Thomas Jefferson did not like paying tribute and was the first president to use force against them. He refused to increase tribute and Tripoli declared war on the United States. Jefferson had the Navy blockade Tripoli from 1803-1805. A Marine contingent captured the city of Derna and the Pasha of Tripoli signed a Treaty promising to extract no more tribute. It was not until Madison's presidency that hostilities finally stopped when he declared war on Algeria.

BHO: "I seek a new beginning between America and Muslims…based on mutual respect; based on principles of justice;…tolerance and the dignity of all human beings."

These are concepts imbedded in Western Civilization and not always shared with other cultures and O should know this. How clever is this man? A Muslim will never respect a non-Muslim for the Quran tells him that Muslims are the best of people and to subjugate all non-Muslims. A non-Muslim has no standing in court against a Muslim-so much for equal justice under the law. Muslims can marry up to four wives, and can marry pre-pubescent girls. Men are commanded to beat an unruly wife according to the Quran. A son inherits twice as much as a daughter. Such is justice and tolerance in Islam.

In the world of Islam, all non-Muslims are treated as second-class citizens. They must not set foot in a mosque. They cannot build a church or repair any old one. They must not make noise when they assemble. They cannot bear arms. Just to give you an idea about how Islam treats its dhimmi citizens, roughly 270 million souls have been killed as a result of 1400 years of jihad and Muslim rule. So much for the dignity of the human being.

O: "…change cannot happen overnight." Why is it America's responsibility to dispel mistrust that Muslims feel for the West? It is not mistrust we must address with the Muslim world but how we can keep them from taking over our country. Islam is engaged in a stealth jihad to subvert the government of this country by any and all means possible and to turn it into a Muslim country. They have a plan for taking over America just as they have a plan for taking over Europe-and look at Europe now. It is ready to topple to Islam within another 10 years or sooner. When Americans realize that we are at war with Islam, then we can begin an intelligent defense of our way of life.

O says: "…my father came from a Kenyan family that includes generations of Muslims." He avoids saying his father was a Muslim, which would open him to charges of apostasy. And the penalty for denying the faith of Islam is death. Of course, this may not matter. With a friend like him as president of the USA he is of more value to them alive.

O says that Thomas Jefferson kept a "Holy" Quran in his personal library. This is a smooth and smarmy half truth. Did Jefferson study Islam? Only to know the treachery therein. See the comments about the Treaty of Tripoli. Also Jefferson when Ambassador to France in 1786 met the Ambassador Abdrahaman of Tripoli to iron out relations. Jefferson repeatedly stated that we were not at war with Tripoli and Abdrahaman corrected him. He stated that Sura 47 of the Quran clearly states that America was at war with Tripoli. So Jefferson consulted his Quran to understand how we were at war with Tripoli. Islam is at war with all non-Muslim nations, then and now.

O says: …I consider it my responsibility as POTUS to fight against negative stereotypes of Islam…" If these exist, why is it his responsibility? What about Jews? Hindus? Blacks? Southerners? If only Islam, Why? On what Basis? By what justification?

O says: "America is not a stereotype of a self-interested empire." Why did he not take the opportunity to say how we extend a helping hand to our defeated enemies. What about the billions we have spent on Islamic societies.

O says there are seven million Muslims in America. Why would he enlarge the truth. There are probably less than two million. He says we can live in peace and security, get an education and work with dignity. No mention here of the Islamic supremacist agenda that would deny the right of non-Muslims to live with dignity.

O: "When innocents in Bosnia and Darfun are slaughtered…" O pandering to Muslims as he picks two places where he believes the chief victims are Muslims.

O says: "…however, history has…been a record of…tribes subjugating one another…" This has been done so under the divine imperative to make non-Muslims "feel themselves subdued." (Quran 9:24)

O says: "…any world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will inevitably fail." Islam's goal in America is to eliminate and destroy Western Civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions. Does this count as an attempt to elevate "one nation or group of people over another?"

O: "America is not and never will be at war with Islam." "…we reject the killing of innocent men, women and children." To say that America will never be at war with Islam is a grave error. Can he predict the future? The definition of "innocent is a Western Christian concept that does not have the same meaning in Islam. Only Muslims can be innocent but non-Muslims in the "house of war" are never innocent.

O in talking about extremists in Afghanistan talks about Islam and America combining to fight them and quotes the Quran, "…whoever kills an innocent, it is as if he killed all mankind….." His reference is to Quran 5:32. 5:33 doesn't convey the beautiful spirit (more O sleight of hand), mandating crucifixion or amputation for those who fight against Allah and Muhammad.

O says: " Islam is not part of the problem in combating violent extremism-it is an important part of promoting peace." No mention of the imperative within Islamic text and teachings to subjugate Infidels.

O states that, "The sooner the extremists are isolated and unwelcome in Muslim communities, the sooner we will all be safer." Why will this happen now? On what basis does O think or hope it will?

O compares the Jewish Holocaust with the Gaza Strips refugees is unconscionable. I am ashamed for his speech and apologize to all Jews. The Gaza Strip refugees suffer daily humiliations all while lobbing countless missiles into Israel. Israel must defend its people. A culture of hatred and violence makes Israel's actions quite necessary. O, Americans are not interested in "Palestinian" aspirations. We all are interested in helping and strengthening Israel-the only democracy in the Middle East.

O's two state solution will not curb the jihad attacks against Israel. He says "Palestinians" must abandon violence. He then segues into how black America suffered under slavery. To compare "Palestinians" with black Americans is unconscionable. For the comparison to hold, black Americans must have been launching daily rocket attacks against white civilians and blowing themselves up at segregated lunch counters during crowded lunch hours.

O says: "…"Palestinians" [must] focus on what they can build." They have been asked to build for years and have never heeded the call. Israelis gave them $14 million for greenhouses during the Gaza turnover. They turned them into weapons smuggling tunnels.

O is seeking a world in which no nations hold nuclear weapons. Would he give up ours and expect the world to follow? Then he says Iran has a right to peaceful nuclear power!!! Here is a country that has enough oil to power itself for a millennium. Here is a country that would wipe Israel off the map if they had nuclear weapons. Is this man a fool?

O talks of democracy. "No system of government….should be imposed upon one nation by another." Does this include Sharia? O does not understand that in Islam there is a very different meaning of "justice" and "freedom." Or maybe he misunderstands like a fox.

O discusses religious freedom. "Islam has a proud tradition of tolerance. We see it in the history of Andalusia and Cordoba…" O yea who has not read history is doomed to repeat it. But America does not want to go down the hole with you O. When Islam was master over Spain, all non believers were killed or made slaves. The 'people of the book" (Christians and Jews) were allowed, if they did not convert, to pay tax and practice their religion. They could not build new churches or repair the old ones. O knows that the laws of dhimmitude gives his claim of a "proud tradition of tolerance" the same hollow ring as stories of prominent American blacks from the slavery and Jim Crow era's.

Fredrick Douglass and Booker T. Washington were great men but their accomplishments not only do not erase or controvert the oppression of their people, but render them all the more poignant and haunting. Whatever the Christians and Jews of Al-Andalus accomplished, they were still dhimmis. The rights and privileges they had were not out of any sense of the dignity of all people before God, or the equality of all before the law, but at the sufferance of their Muslim overlords.

"People in every country should be free to choose and live their faith based upon the persuasion of the mind, heart, and soul." -Obama

"If anyone changes his religion, kill him." Muhammad, the prophet of Islam.

O discusses women's rights. How will O overcome a culture with teachings like this:

O The Quran likens a woman to a field, to be used by a man as he wills (2:223)

O A woman's testimony is worth half that of a man's. (2:282)

O A man can have up to four wives and sex with a slave girl. (4:3)

O A son's inheritance is twice the size of that of a daughter. (4:11)

O Husbands are to beat disobedient wives. (4:34)

O Allows for marriage to pre-pubescent girls. (65:4)

The dignity, equality and freedom within Islam is breathtaking is it not?

O preposterously suggests that our immoral pop culture causes the pious, modest Muslims to engage in jihad against America. Jihad theorist Sayyid Qutb was scandalized by dancing at a church social in Greely, Colorado in 1948. Eight centuries before Qutb a recurring feature of Muslim polemic was against the sexual immorality of the "Franks."

O proposes billions in taxes by offering Islam:

O Expanded exchange program for their students.

O Muslim student internships.

O Online education and networks.

O New corps of business volunteers.

O Summit on Entrepreneurship.

O Fund supporting technological development in Muslim countries.

O Transfer ideas to marketplace to create jobs.

O Open centers of scientific excellence in Africa, Middle East & SE Asia.

O Appoint new science envoys to develop new sources of energy, create green jobs, digitize records, clean water and grow new crops.

O Partner with OIC to eradicate polio.

O Partner with Muslim communities to promote child and maternal health.

O, Americans are not ready to partner with Muslims in such a massive and expensive manner. What will be the returns for this massive effort? Islam still wants to subjugate Infidel Americans. The new Congress with sensible individuals will nip this in the bud before it even gets to the hatching stage.

DMN, you cannot just run the unvarnished half truths in a speech like O's. Please give us some intelligent commentary.

Back                          Top

«« Back
  Search Articles
  Special Annoucements