Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
 

Sabarimala: SC imposed a post Victorian thought on us, which is opposed to Indian ethos

Author: Vicky Nanjappa
Publication: .One India.com
Date: October 9, 2018
URL:      https://www.oneindia.com/amphtml/india/sabarimala-sc-imposed-a-post-victorian-thought-on-us-which-is-opposed-to-indian-ethos-2790199.html?
utm_source=article&utm_medium=tweet-button&utm_campaign=article-tweet&__twitter_impression=true

One of the most debated and criticised verdicts in recent times is the one relating to the Sabarimala Temple. The Supreme Court had said that women of all age groups can enter the temple. In no time there were protests and also a review petition in the Supreme Court.

The review stated that only a believer could have challenged the customs at the temple and the original plea was filed by someone unconnected. D K Hari, the co-founder and author, who runs, Bharath Gyan along with his wife Hema Hari says that the Sabarimala verdict was passed on a post victorian thought, which does not have resonance with the Indian ethos. Bharath Gyan is a Chennai based NGO engaged in research of India's traditions and culture.

D K Hari while discussing with OneIndia the verdict also says that opinion on a denomination temple like Sabarimala should not and cannot be formed on the basis of a western thought that has been imposed on India erroneously.

The problem with the word believer:

Hari says that to start with he has a problem with the word believer. A believer is only for Islam and Christianity, the Abrahamic faith. We do not have believers. We are seekers and that is the fundamental difference.

A believer is an idea that is thrust upon you. You believe it whether it is wrong or right. You believe it whether you like it or not. We are people who seek. Hence, believer is not the right word to use, he also says. Hari also says that the term Hinduism was brought in by the British and cemented by the Supreme Court.

Shad Madham:

Prior to that we had something called Shad Madham. There are six ways of religion that we have- Sauram, Saktham, Ganapathyam, Kaumaram, Shaivism and Vaishanavam. These were the six religions that India had. Shad Madham is concept from the times of Adi Shankar, who lived around 540 DCE. This means this concept has been in India for about 2,400 years and more.

D K Hari and Hema

Prior to this we had the concept of Sanathana Dharma. Sanathana means, oldest as well as the ever young, which means it keeps moulding to the current changes and needs as per time. Dharma means character, which includes good living or living with character. Sanathana Dharma means living with sync with nature (Prakriti), times (Kala), sciences (Vigyana) and righteous character (Dharma).

What is a denomination temple:

This means there were six different temple worshippers. There are two things that however crept in between. One was animal sacrifice and the other was the caste based debarring of entry into the temples. Both have been rightfully removed, Hari says. The way how moss collects in stagnant water, in this case these two aberrations creep in, which should be periodically removed.

Each of these denominations had their temples and the Constitution allows denomination temples and the right to practise the denominational practises, Hari explains. There were temples part of these six denominations and there are also temples outside these denominations.

The Sabarimala Temple has a combination of both Vaishanvism and Shavism because there is a combination of both Shiva and Vishu in Lord Ayyappa. Denomination can be any of the six or a combination of the six or any type beyond the six. Each also has the right to their denominational practises as enshrined in the Constitution.

The caste system:

Like the term Hinduism, the caste system was introduced by the British. Prior to the caste system we had a 'Jaathi Vrna' system. The word Jaathi comes from the word Janam, which speaks about birth. Vrna is not about colour, but about choice. It has been wrongly mentioned as colour, Hari says.

In this the girl gets to chose and as we say in Hindi, Var Doodna (find the groom). It is the girl who has the choice and not the boy. That is why it called Swayamvar where the girl is the final person who makes the choice. These are the features and facets of the Indian thought, Hari further adds. This is very much like how the animal kingdom also functions. The tigress choses the tiger, lioness chose the lion, honey bee choses the bee and so on.

Hence the Indian ethos and Sanatha Dharma is in sync with nature in thought and practise.

Equality vs complimentary:

Another aspect that Hari draws our attention to is regarding the concept of equality. He says that India never stood for equality, but for something more profound and beyond.

Equality is a very western concept imposed on India. In the West women have always been considered as inferior. Whereas in India, we have had for centuries women who were warriors, scholars and mathematicians. Due to this there was no need for equality in India.

We had a thought called Saha, which means complimentary. The wife is called the Saha Dharmini- the one who treads the path of Dharma along with with the man in a complimentary nature. The brother and sister are Sahodara and Sahodari for their complimentary siblings and are not equals, Hari also explains.

Sama on the other hand means equal in India. Each has a function and role to play, but the fact is that they are not equal to you, but complimentary to you. Even the third gender Napumsaka has a role to play, Hari adds.

Hari says, even the West today is slowly moving away from equality and going towards complimentary. For them, this move is new and post-modern, while we in India have been speaking this complimentary nature for 1,000s of years.

Imposing equality:

Imposing the concept of equality is just a passing phase. All such movements are fads and the equality movement will over the next few decades become complimentary. Equality is not natural, but complimentary is. Imposed thoughts have had their run and failed, Hari also says.

Sabarimala the denomination temple:

Commenting on the Sabarimala issue, Hari says that one must understand the core idea before an opinion is framed. Opinion on a denomination temple such as Sabarimala should not and cannot be formed on the basis of a western thought that has been imposed on India erroneously.

When we have a complimentary nature and a denomination temple, then such temples have the right to frame their own rules, within the ethos of civilisation, which is over many 1,000s of years old. At the same time it is also ensured that it is not grossly ultra virus to the Constitution, which is just 70 years old. There is a need to balance both.
 
«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements