|
X
Vandalism and apology
The history of Christianity
is full of instances of vandalism committed in the name of the religion.
Sir Vidiadhar Naipaul and Shri Sumit Paul, above, has given a rationale
for this happening - namely an attempt to erase one's past. There was a
physical vandalism in teems of destroying indigenous places of worship,
killing those who come in the way, etc, to terrorise the people to do the
bidding of their new masters. There was also psychological vandalism in
terms of destroying the culture of the converted people, perverting the
true meaning of the civilisational idioms and symbols, distorting the history
of the land, etc.
The relationship between
Jews and Christianity has been one of continual animosity. The primary
reason has been the propaganda that it was due to the Jews that Christ
was nailed to the cross. Christ's teachings were supposed to have weakened
Judaism and so he became the 'enemy' of the Jews. There have been numerous
cases of discrimination against the Jews in various countries. The climax
was the German Holocaust. The silence of Vatican in not condemning the
atrocities at the time they were perpetuated has been a major bone of contention.
In the recent past,
various Popes and other members of the Roman Catholic hierarchy have offered
apologies of different levels of contrition. The Vatican has come out with
a document on the subject, and the French Archbishop Oliver de Berranger
said, "We beg God's pardon and we ask the Jewish people to hear our words
of repentance." (Newsweek, October 13, 1997.)
Similarly, in January
1995, the German Roman Catholic bishops have accepted that the Catholics
share responsibility for the Nazi holocaust, since they failed to act against
Nazism. In what is said to be an unusually blunt confession of guilt, the
bishops said, "The denial and guilt that was prevalent in those days also
came from the church. During the period of the Third Reich, Christians
did not carry out the required resistance to racist anti-Semitism." As
per a leading Catholic theologian, Shri Johann-Baptist Metz, there was
a "a new quality" in the statement, and predicted that it would inspire
"Christian moral courage." (Stephen Kinzer, "German church admits to holocaust
guilt", The Times of India, Jan 30, 1995.)
The indigenous people
of South America have started to voice their protests against the atrocities
of the past. Such action has forced the Roman Catholic Church to acknowledge
the wilful destruction that took place in the name of Christianity, and
has sought an apology form the people. During his visit to the continent
in October 1992, Pope John Paul II called upon the Indians of the Dominican
Republic "to forgive those who, for 500 years, brought pain and suffering"
to the Indian peoples. (CIMI - Indianist missionary Council, Brasilia,
October 15, 1992.)
During a visit to Slovakia
in Eastern Europe in July 1995, the Pope visited Presov, where there is
a monument to 24 Calvinists, who were beheaded in 1687 for refusing to
convert to Roman Catholicism' In atoning the Roman Catholic Church's action
to condemn them to death, the Pope's official spokesman said that the visit
was meant to 'render justice and heal old wounds'. (The Times of India,
Editorial, July 15, 1997.)
However, when it comes
to the Hindus, the sentiments shown is exactly the opposite. In a letter
dated June 10, 1994, to both the Roman Catholic Archbishops of Delhi and
Mumbai, the President of the VHP, Shri Vishnu Hari Dalmia, wrote: "It will
be in the fitness of things if the Church in India recognises its unsavoury
role in the past and while admitting the same, assures the population of
India that it will desist from such prejudicial activities in all parts
of the country. Such a proclamation from the Church will not only pave
the way for amity between these two great religions, but will also set
an example for other religionists to emulate."
A reminder was sent
on August 5 to both the persons. The secretary of the Archbishop of Mumbai
merely acknowledged the receipt of the letter. The Archbishop of Delhi
was in a combative mood that often reflects the thinking of the hierarchy
in India. He wrote in a letter dated October 3, "I don't think any useful
purpose will be served by going backwards into the past and especially
trying to point out mistakes committed by various communities and members
of the various religions who are living together in harmony in India. Our
country has the unique record of harbouring the world's greatest religions
whose followers, by and large, live together in peace, in tolerance. We
Indians should do our best to preserve this heritage which in my belief
is a great gift of God."
On October 14, Shri
Dalmia wrote: "In recognising the past, the intention is to inform the
present generation of the history as it is. It will also be a beacon for
the manner of the interaction for nowadays. Just like the Germans and the
others of today are not being blamed for the crimes of the Nazis, the apology
that has been tendered is a clear indication that they do not associate
with the philosophy of the Nazis. This is the way for living together in
harmony in India. I would very much like to have your views on the points
that I have raised."
This is where the correspondence
rests - that is, there is no need to engage in a sincere dialogue. Subsequently
the VHP pointed out the hypocrisy of the Roman Catholic Church in apologising
to the Jews and the South American Indians, while refusing to even consider
a similar act towards the Hindus. The office of the Archbishop of Mumbai
said, "It is categorically denied that prejudicial activities were resorted
by Roman Catholic missionaries in the centuries gone by nor has Dalmia
made mention of a single such instance." (The Indian Express, April
24, 1996, "Negation of history is the best way to frustrate a dialogue")
Contents Page
Back to Home
|
|