Yes. Even though the Hindus were still
not their own masters, at least an option of seeking the return through
the judiciary process was available to them. This was taken up and a case
was filed in 1885.
The essential section of the judgement
that was delivered in 1886 reads as follows: "It is most unfortunate that
a masjid should have been built on land specially held sacred by the Hindus,
but as the event occurred 356 years ago it is too late now to remedy the
grievance. All that can be done is to maintain the status quo. In such
a case as the present one any innovation could cause more harm and derangement
of order than benefit."
A proper reading of the above judgement
would clearly indicate that the Hindus have proved their right over the
site. The second part of the judgement indicates that the British did
not feel it necessary to be overly concerned about the Hindu sentiments
since they were not their own masters. The harm that would be caused was
to the colonial masters, and not to the Hindus. |