|
|
No. First, the site belongs to the Hindus.
Second, the Babri structure that stood there cannot be considered to be
a place of worship. It was a political monument to remind the Hindus that
they were slaves. Third, Hindus have made many sincere efforts to find
a peaceful solution to the problem, through negotiations. Finally, since
independence it is functioning as a temple. What happened on December
6, 1992, was an expression of the Hindu frustration at being denied what
legitimately belongs to them.
Furthermore, in answering this question,
one has also to look at what tolerance really means. It means that one
accepts that another has a way of moksha or salvation which is unique
to him. It does not mean that if someone tries to harm a person, the latter
should meekly submit. That would be cowardice. |