|
|
Yes. In both the cases, the temples were
deliberately destroyed in the name of Islam. In both the cases, the destruction
was carried out by the invading forces who came from outside the country,
Hindus made enormous personal sacrifices in protecting their sacred monuments,
Hindus demonstrated great attachment not only to the temples but also
to the site, and Hindus made continuous efforts for recovery of the site
even when Islam ruled the areas. Such similarities abound.
Perhaps the only difference can find is
that in case of Somnath, no religious place was built over the ruins of
the vandalised temple. However, next to the ruins of the ancient Hindu
place of worship, a small mosque was built within the temple precincts.
Even this small structure was built not with any religious objective,
but to give the same political message as in the case of the Babri structure
at the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi - namely that Hindus were now slaves of Islam.
After all, if there was a need for the Muslims for a place of worship,
it could have been built some distance away. |