|
|
Yes. Construction of structures, either
religious or secular, over sites vandalised by the invaders has been a
standard practice of both Islam and Christianity all over the world. The
Hindus have been no exception to this barbaric practice. The objective
of the new structure is to show the conquered people that the invaders
were the new masters, and hence the structure had nothing but a political
message. To draw any other meaning clearly signifies that the programme
of trampling of the sentiments of the indigenous people is sought to be
continued. This is no way to have cordial relations between groups. In
the English translation of the Persian diary of Babur Nama, Annete Beveridge
mentions specifically the destruction of the temple. She says that Babur
was impressed with the dignity and sanctity of the ancient Hindu shrine
at the Shri Rama Janmabhoomi. She also says that as an obedient follower
of Mohammed, Babur regarded the substitution of the temple by a mosque
as a dutiful and worthy action. |