|
|
The act has to be interpreted in terms
of the one who committed it. From what Babur has written about himself
in his Babur Nama, it is clear that his intention was also to spread Islam.
His actions after his victories also attest to this fact. It is true that
he had a political mantle in terms of being a ruler. But in Islam most
of the rulers also did take all actions to propagate their religion. This
is something that has happened all over the world, and the treatment meted
out in India to the Hindus is no exception.
If Babur was purely a political person,
there would have been no need, one, to destroy a place of worship of the
indigenous people and, two, to construct an alien place of worship and/or
victory monument where such destruction took place. The fact that the
Babri structure was built after destroying a temple in honour of Shri
Rama establishes the religious nature of the act.
Whether it is destroyed for a religious
reason or for a political one, the Babri structure, supposed to be a Muslim
place of worship, would still be termed as a monument of the slavery and
subjugation of the Hindus. Also, since it was built after destroying Shri
Rama's temple, the recovery of the site is still justified. The Hindus
are not asking for the return of the thousands of the vandalised sites,
but only three that are the most important to them in their tradition.
|