Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
archive: Pathetic state (Two letters)

Pathetic state (Two letters)

Anjani Puri, N. Prasad
Sunday
June 20-26, 1999


    Title: Pathetic state (Two letters)
    Author: Anjani Puri, N. Prasad
    Publication: Sunday
    Date: June 20-26, 1999
    
    
    Author: Anjani Puri, New Delhi
    
    The "letter bomb" written by Sharad Pawar, P. A. Sangma and Tariq
    Anwar raises some important questions concerning national interests
    (The challenge, 23-29 May).  The Congress is clinging to Sonia Gandhi
    and claiming that she is entitled to become PM.  Reason: she belongs
    to the Nehru-Gandhi family.  But is this the sole qualification to
    make the Italian-born Sonia PM of India?  Sonia who married Rajiv in
    1968 took to Indian citizenship only in 1983, after it became clear
    that Rajiv would become the PM. Given this background, the revolt by
    the "Three Man Amy' against Sonia is not unreasonable.
    
    Further, what's Sonia's political experience compared to that of
    Pawar, Sangma, or even Tariq Anwar?  She became a Congress party
    member only two years back.  And today she wants to become the PM. 
    Don't Sangma, Pawar and Anwar have a right to protest?  If Sonia's
    only aim is to save and strengthen the Congress, where is the need to
    nurture prime ministerial ambitions?  It's a pity that a 114-year-old
    party has to depend on Sonia for survival.
    
    
    =======================Author: N. Prasad, New Delhi
    
    With reference to the cover story The challenge, here are points to
    ponder for those who are affected by Sonia syndrome:
    
    Sonia married Rajiv Gandhi in 1968.  She could have taken Indian
    citizenship in 1973.  But she did so only in 1983, when Rajiv's chance
    of becoming PM was certain.  Does this prove that India is her
    country?
    
    In 1977, after the defeat of Mrs Indira Gandhi, she took refuge in the
    Italian embassy.  Sonia came back to her mother-in-law's house only
    after much persuasion.  Then how can she say that India is her
    motherland?
    
    Sonia became a voter in 1980 itself, though she became an Indian
    citizen in 1983.  Doesn't this show her political ambitions at an very
    early stage?
    
    If her sole ambition is only to "serve the Congress party" why should
    she nurture PM ambitions?
    
    Finally, does she still retain "dual-citizenship" - Indian and
    Italian?
    
    If Sonia Gandhi would be kind enough to reply to these questions, her
    position will become much more stronger in the nation.
    



Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements