Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
archive: Fruits Of Kargil: New World Order Favours A Strong India

Fruits Of Kargil: New World Order Favours A Strong India

Romesh Diwan
The Statesman
July 1, 1999


    Title: Fruits Of Kargil: New World Order Favours A Strong India
    Author: Romesh Diwan
    Publication:  The Statesman
    Date: July 1, 1999
    
    THE Kargil skirmish is the result of a long-planned and well-executed
    invasion by Pakistan's army across the line of control. The terrain is
    difficult at an elevation of 15,000 feet with high ridges. Invaders
    have an initial advantage; their encampments are located on high
    ridges about 6 km from Pakistani territory. Indian forces are
    confronted with an invading force of well-trained, well-armed
    Pakistani army regulars and experienced mercenaries-cum-terrorists of
    Afghan war vintage. The invading forces comprise Pakistani army
    regulars, mercenaries belonging to the Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, declared
    an international terrorist organisation by the US, the
    Lashkar-e-Toiba, the militant wing of the Markaz Dawa Al Irshad and
    the Al Badr, made up of Afghan mercenaries, and terrorists from Osman
    bin Laden's Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami, also known as Tehrik-e-Jihad or
    Al Qaeda.
    
    The manoeuvrability of the Indian troops and aircraft is restricted
    because the Indian government does not want the conflict to escalate.
    The Kargil operation is the most complex and difficult
    counter-insurgency operation ever undertaken anywhere in the world.
    Indian forces are slowly, but surely, clearing infiltrators'
    encampments.
    
    MILITARY MIGHT
    
    Judging from the cowardly and barbaric torture of captured Indian
    soldiers it is clear that the Pakistan army is losing the battle. In
    the given circumstances, however, it will take a long time to flush
    out the infiltrators completely.
    
    The reaction of major international powers is a crucial factor. For
    the time being the US and its western allies, have recognised that the
    infiltration constitutes an invasion by Pakistan and that India is
    within its right to oust these invaders from its territory. Russia, as
    usual is openly supporting India. China is not supporting Pakistan's
    position. The Pakistan army is capable and irrational, and willing to
    escalate the conflict, which cannot be concluded swiftly, into an open
    war. If the conflict drags on it is uncertain whether or not these
    powers will maintain their pro-India position.
    
    With the fall of the Berlin Wall and the disintegration of the USSR
    the world order is no more bipolar, but is dominated by the US. The US
    has displayed its military might since. During the Cold War, China was
    the emerging regional power in Asia, India being another possible
    regional power. Chinese national interests required it to keep India
    weak. It did so by providing Pakistan military assistance, thus
    setting it up as a counterbalance, and legitimacy as well as economic
    benefits to Indian communists who supported pro-China and anti-India
    policies - the "aging communists" to use CR Irani's thoughtful phrase.
    
    Moreover, since the USSR supported India, the US and its allies
    followed their imperialist instincts to keep India weak. Towards this
    end it provided military aid to Pakistan while its propaganda
    establishment disseminated the notion that Pakistan was India's equal.
    Pakistan thus got military support from both communist China and the
    imperialist US; the Indian army in Kargil today is thus facing both
    American Stinger missiles and Chinese rockets. The US also promoted
    the RNI (resident non-Indian) elite by instilling in them their
    western ideologies. This RNI class initiated and maintained "political
    correctness" which has weakened India and can be considered
    responsible for the present problem. Keeping India weak by harping on
    divisive issues, IMF-type reforms, and promoting Congress servility
    has been the hallmarks of the anti-national attitudes of the RNI elite
    for which the US has rewarded them with legitimacy, financial grants,
    and paid visits to the US.
    
    BETTER DIALOGUE
    
    In the last decade the new world order has been changing and is very
    different from what it was a decade ago. China is emerging as a world
    power while Russia has become irrelevant. The superiority of the US
    and its Nato allies has made it so confident that it bombed Yugoslavia
    without consulting the the UN. Its objectives were imperialist. Though
    unstated, these were clear: "might is right", the US will always
    prevail; it required humiliating China and Russia and that the bombing
    tried to accomplish. Such is the arrogance of power.
    
    The success of the new world order is connected to US corporations'
    need to have access to world markets. However, the Yugoslavian bombing
    has alienated a many countries, especially China and Russia.
    Anti-American attitudes don't help US corporations to get access to
    markets. The US, therefore, can't afford anti-Americanism to get out
    of hand in India as well. The US has also realised that they need to
    contain China; both because of its growing strength and its
    estrangement from the US. US national interest, therefore, requires
    making India a counterbalance to China, particularly now that India
    also has nuclear capability; at the minimum it does not want India to
    get closer to China. For both economic and security reasons, a strong
    India is now in the US's interest. These two factors explain why the
    US government appreciates India's perspective, and action, in the
    Kargil area today; a perception that is very unusual given its past
    habits and practices.
    
    China's national interests in this changing world order are also
    favourable to a strong India. A powerful US and its security pact with
    Japan is against China's national interests. Yet China is in no
    position to take on the US directly. A strong and supportive India
    could further its national interest. That may explain why China has
    stayed quiet and has not openly supported Pakistan. It also explains
    Jaswant Singh's perception of a new willingness to develop a better
    dialogue.
    
    WISE DECISION
    
    In this emerging world order, economics and security are integrated.
    Therefore, both the US and China who previously found a weak India in
    their national interest now recognise that their own national
    interests are better served by a strong India. If these realities make
    sense, external conditions are now favourable for India to develop
    strong security positions. India is fortunate that Mr Atal Behari
    Vajpayee is its Prime Minister at this juncture. One can't compliment
    him enough on his wisdom; his insights, instincts and understanding
    has put India on the path to greater strength.
    
    The emerging scenario vindicates Pokhran as a very wise decision.
    Vajpayee is also tackling the India's internal weakness. Last year
    when he formed a government he had a motley coalition, an
    irresponsible Opposition, an anti-national and hostile media, an
    unsupportive President, a non-functioning, unfriendly bureaucracy and
    a divisive intellectual elite. Thirteen months later, he has coalesced
    the coalition into a National Democratic Alliance, earned respect from
    many of these hostile groups and hammered home a concern for
    nationalist issues. Most of India's internal weakness remain, but a
    move to remove them has now been initiated. If the nationalist forces
    can move forward, Kargil, and the loss of so much Indian blood, may
    yet turn out to be a blessing in disguise.
    



Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements