Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Pakistan's Feudo-democracy

Pakistan's Feudo-democracy

Author:
Publication: The Times of India
Date: October 5, 2000

``Partition was the biggest mistake in the history of mankind'' suddenly declared Altaf Hussain, exiled chief of the Muttahida Quami Movement (MQM), Pakistan's third largest political party, in London last month.  Even as Pakistan-watchers tried to digest the import of his statement and the Pakistani media lambasted Hussain for his ``ultimate betrayal'', the first-ever MQM delegation arrived in New Delhi.  The MQM is presently headed by Khalid Maqbool Siddiqui, who resigned from Nawaz Sharif's government as industries minister, as a protest against harassment of MQM workers by the Pakistan's army and police.  Pakistan's political culture, Siddiqui tells Mahendra Ved, is one of ``loton, lifafon aur looteron" -- opportunists, bribe-takers and criminals.  Excerpts from an interview:

Altaf Hussain's statement that Partition was a big mistake has startled many.

It was not a casual remark.  It is a reflection of many years of experience, study and pain experienced by Mr Hussain and many of his compatriots.  He was referring to the root cause when he made this remark.  It was to emphasise the magnitude of the suffering people have undergone in terms of life and property, both in India and Pakistan.  In Pakistan, the effects of the division are visible even today after 53 years.  You can say the MQM has decided to step up its campaign.  We brought together acknowledged leaders of the Balochs, the Pathans and the Sindhis.  These national minorities realise the need to come together.  It is history in the making.  It is a sincere effort, let me assure you.  We have a joint platform.  It is too early to say how we will work from here on.  But it is the first step towards a joint struggle.

Your description of minorities as `nationalities' is perplexing.

They are actually sub-nationalities, distinct from one another.  The point we underscore is that they have common problems and they have a common adversary: the majority Punjab province and the dominant Punjabi, are all-pervasive as a political class and in civil and military bureaucracy.  When we criticise the Punjabi, it is not so much people of that province but the ruling class which has exploited the minorities.  You will be shocked to know that from provincial chief ministers onwards, even the police SHOs are selected by their principal instrument, the ISI.

The Punjabis, Pathans, Balochs and Sindhis are sons of the soil in terms of geography.  Mohajirs are refugees who do not belong there, but you talk of ``mohajir nation''.  Don't you think "mohajir" is a negative concept? Because, nowhere is a refugee allowed to share power.

Well, our forefathers migrated to Pakistan, but we are now sons of the soil.  Secondly, a mohajir is a migrant, not a refugee.  People down the ages have migrated and found a place under the sun through hard work.  This is what we did.  Please note that the US is a nation of immigrants.

Since MQM remains a party of immigrants, how do you explain its rise?

We are also a party of the middle classes, the lower and the middle-middle classes, in a feudal society.  Whenever the democratric game is played, the numbers count.  But Pakistan has never had real democracy, I would call it `pseudo', even `feudo' democracy.  In that setting, the PPP was a creation of Ayub Khan and Nawaz Sharif's Muslim League was nurtured by Zia ul Haq.  We are not the creation of the Establishment.  We have been born in martial law and have grown in adversity.  We have been consistent in our opposition to the army rule and to the landlords.  So we stray close to the masses.  The older generation among the mohajirs thought we were ``laundon-lapaadon ki jamaat'' -- a party of the young and the lumpens.  They took time to accept us.

Now our support is clear, particularly in urban Sindh.  The Sindhis vote for the PPP and the Punjabis vote for the Muslim League.  We would have done much better, but successive regimes have ensured that we cannot even open offices in provinces outside of Sindh.

How does a young mohajir look at India?

There is a sea-change with the change of generations and with the advent of technology and media.  Our elders saw Pakistan as a mission and worked for its success.  But the young do not have that mission.  They have an identity crisis.  A young mohajir sees that five decades separation has harmed both India and Pakistan -- Pakistan more so.  You have become the world's largest democracy, but we have missed the bus.  You have sustained your plurality, while we have witnessed repression.  We think India and Pakistan must talk and resolve their differences.  It is good for both.  It will strengthen our political and social institutions.  Money spent on defence could be diverted to health and education.  To me, the nuclear bomb is not important, a nuclear scientist is.

Fine, but the root cause of turmoil, according to Pakistan, is Kashmir, which is also fomenting cross-border movement of drugs, arms and men.

The MQM is quite clear on Kashmir.  Let the will of the Kashmiri people prevail.  Both India and Pakistan must facilitate this.  Beyond that, we have not taken sides.  We think Talibanisation is misinterpretation of Islam, a threat to our religious, ethnic and linguistic identities.  The Taliban are an ISI creation.  Even in Afghanistan, the Taliban are imposed by the ISI.  No sane people would have gone into Afghanistan the way Zia did, but today, Afghanistan has made billionaires out of our generals and bureaucrats.

Whether it is the army rule, that of the PPP or of the Muslim League, the MQM has always been targeted.  So what is the solution?

End of army rule, break up of feudal structure and decentralisation of power.  Repeated fauji governments have only weakened Pakistan.

What is your mission here.  What do you expect from India?

Our expectations are from both India and Indians.  They should take a proactive role to help us restructure our polity.  Altaf bhai will soon address Indians, the Indian Muslims in particular -- even more particularly, Jammu and Kashmir Muslims, especially a section that wants to be merged with Pakistan.  Draw a lesson from us.  I ask them: Do you want liberation and death.  Do you want to become a colony of Pakistan? If India does not help us, the whole region will be destabilised and Talibanised.  After 53 years, Pakistan is being ruled by 46 families.  A population of 130 million is being held hostage.  We want India's help because it is no use treating the symptoms alone without tackling the root cause.

How do you propose to further your programme?

We certainly want our rights within Pakistan, rather than outside it, unless we are pushed to the wall.  Nobody should think that we are against Pakistan and have come here to seek the Indian government's help.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements