Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Advani knows to use offence for defence

Advani knows to use offence for defence

Author: Sankarashan Thakur
Publication: The Indian Express
Date: May 19, 2001
 
To begin with, Home Minister L. K. Advani ducked and dallied for months but when he decided to go to the Liberhan Commission on the Ayodhya demolition, he went there on the front-foot.

His four de-positions before the Commission so far haven't shown up a man in the dock, as many might have expected, but a man very much on the Ayodhya platform, forging ahead with the temple campaign.

Prime Minister A. B. Vajpayee stopped short of calling the Ayodhya temple movement an "expression of national sentiment" and created widespread uproar. Advani has not just glorified the movement but sanctified the existence of a Ram Temple at the disputed site in Ayodhya without so much as creating a ripple.

The temporary structure erected on the rubble of the Babri Masjid, according to the Home Minister, is "nothing but a temple ... it was earlier a de facto temple, now it is de jure", or, in plain English, by law right. This, he said at his second deposition to the Commission in April.

The Commission asked if this did not mean he was bypassing the judiciary and pronouncing judgement on the dispute when the courts were still hearing the Ayodhya case. Advani said he wasn't talking legally, he was "using words loosely" and talking about public perception: "It has by and large been accepted by all that on the place believed to be the birthplace of Ram there is only a temple". Advani said what he had to essentially say on Ayodhya and yet escaped charges of violating propriety or brief.

Advani has performed an adroit balancing act between his two faces - that of the Home Minister, who cannot be seen to be defending the unlawful, and the Sangh loyalist, who must uphold the Ayodhya movement and its manifestations as a badge of honour. He may have teased the law but he has pleased his constituency. He has made it clearer than ever before that the requirements of government may have made the BJP put Ayodhya on the backburner, but the requirements of politics are that the party keep the burner on the bum.

Advani's deposition has been less a deposition and more a message to a constituency that he believes needs to be humoured because it is still useful.

The Liberhan Commission has been less a probe into Advani's role in the demolition and more a stage for his political expositions on the nature and justifications of the temple movement. Advani ignored the Commission's summons for neatly four months before deciding to appear in April. He has appeared before Justice M.S. Liberhan four times, and each time his silence has spoken as much as his words. He has, for instance, not uttered a word condemning those who razed the structure; neither has he shed a tear for the widerspread communal violence that the temple movement and the demolition set off. Vajpayee may have felt the need to neutralise the saffron sting of his "national sentiment" statement with his liberal musings from Kumarakom. Not so Advani. For him there can be no faulting the Ayodhya movement or the demand for a temple at the disputed site.

Even when he said the demolition of December 6, 1992 had left him "depressed and downcast", he felt proud to defend the temple movement and his rath yatra and underlined his continuing commitment to the construction of a Ram Temple at the disputed site.

He was "not ashamed" of the temple movement or the rath yatra, he said; on the contrary, it was a moment of national glory. "We used to see it in the eves of the people, particularly the rural and tribal folk. It was a sense of reverence normally bestowed on religious men ... It was the rath yatra that made me understand Vivekananda's statement-that religion is the soul of India..."

Advani's deposition can nowhere be faulted for defending the demolition of Babri Masjid. But at the same time, his support for the forces and the psychology hat effected to the demolition are almost eloquent.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements