Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Army chief defends casket deal

Army chief defends casket deal

Author: Our Special Correspondent
Publication: The Hindu
Date: January 25, 2002

The Chief of Army Staff, S. Padmanabhan, has defended the casket deal with an American firm, saying, "There was no mala fide intent. An unnecessary controversy will hopefully now be put to rest."

In a letter to the Defence Minister, George Fernandes, Gen. Padmanabhan commended a booklet on the deal, observing that it put the procurement in perspective. The chronology and facts had been lucidly brought out for all to see that there was no mala fide intent.

On January 21, Gen. Padmanabhan was responding to an official letter of January 14 from the Defence Minister, George Fernandes, which probably directed him to peruse the booklet. The Army chief's letter was released to the media by the author of the booklet, R.V. Pandit.

Speaking at the news conference called by Mr. Pandit, former Army chief, Shankar Roy Chowdhury, regretted that turmoil over defence purchases, beginning with Bofors, had throttled decision-making in the Defence Ministry. "The whole process of acquisition of technology for the armed forces has come to a halt on the administration side" because of political controversies on defence purchases and the subsequent repercussions in the media, observed Gen. Roy Chowdhury.

Making it clear that he was not holding a brief either for or against the casket purchases, Gen. Roy Chowdhury, who is also an independent Rajya Sabha MP, felt that while political debate and media reporting should continue, there should be some way of insulating decision-making from the turbulence generated. As a result of delays in decision-making, the armed forces were forced to surrender up to Rs. 2,000 crores annually. "Part of the reason is due to hesitancy on the part of officials."

Earlier, Mr. Pandit, who is Mr. Fernandes' friend, flayed the CAG for being "miserly on truth" and felt the media should apologise to Mr. Fernandes for tarnishing his reputation.

At the same time, he felt the Government should not go in for arbitration proceedings in the U.S. to recover the money from the casket manufacturer. "Let us not ridicule ourselves in the eyes of intelligent people," he observed, while conceding that bureaucratic gaffes had marred the deal.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements