Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Pakistan has no case in Kashmir

Pakistan has no case in Kashmir

Author: Prof Balraj Madhok
Publication: The Free Press Journal
Date: May 30, 2003

After seeing my first article on Kashmir appear in Free Press Journal issue dated May 13, 2003 I would like to invite the attention of the people of India to the background realities of the Kashmir issue in my observation, not only does the world, inclusive of our own statesmen not comprehend the issue of Kashmir fully but the two generations born in the last 50 years lack the information too.

Although this issue has lingered on for now more than fifty years, the sorry part of the entire episode lies in the ignorance of even the most well read Indian people. Has Pakistan any case at all is the question? The failure of earlier Indian governments to put across their legitimate case is on account of the mess created by both Nehru and Abdullah.

While Abdullah was forever engaged in carving out a path for himself in becoming the sovereign head of an independent Kashmir, Nehru did not ever understand the inner mind of Abdullah who finally betrayed him and India. Nehru because of his arrest done by Maharaja Hari Singh was against him. Abdullah not only was desirous of creating Kashmir as his personal fiefdom but was equally engaged in throwing off the Hindu Dogra regime in Kashmir and bringing in its place a Muslim dominated state. Pakistan has no case at all that an be heard on any International Forum. Admittedly, it was Pakistan from whose territory not only Pakistani Kabailis were picked up from the NWFP to invade the territory of J&K but even the regular troops of Pakistani army were deployed in civilian clothes to invade the territory of the state, under the charge of General Akbar Khan of Pakistan army alias General Tariq. He was so named because in the Islamic history a military general by this name had succeeded in carrying out an Islamic Invasion on the territory of Egypt that had different religions settled on its soil before its fully turned into an Islamic state.

There existed an agreement between the state of J&K and Pakistan through then Governor General Mohd Ali Jinnah who had agreed to permit the Maharaja of J&K to take some more time after 15th August 1947 to arrive at a final decision, to accede to India or Pakistan. Even after having given this assurance in writing, followed by the visit of his personal secretary to Srinagar, Pakistan dishonoured it sown assurance even before he took the final decision to join India and not Pakistan, by invading the territory of J&K even before the ruler had singed the Instrument of Accession in favour of India. While the formal accession took place on October 26th 1947 the Pakistanis had invaded the territory of J&K on October 22nd 1947, Hence after the formal accession had been signed, received and duly acknowledged by the then Governor General of India Lord Mountbatten vide his acceptance dated 27th October 1947, it became the duty of the Govt of India to protect its invaded territory and to drive away the aggressors. Earlier there was one Ramchandra Kak, who was the Prime Minister of the state of J&K. He kept Sheik Abdullah in jail for the concluded trial. Ramchandra Kak entertained an idea of keeping J&K state under the Maharaja as an independent state but the events overtook him when the Radcliff award defining borders of division between India and Pakistan were announced. Mehr Chand Mahajan came to replace the former PM Ramchandra Kak and on his advise that the new PM rushed to New Delhi and concluded the formality of signing the instrument of accession and obtaining its acceptance within 24 hours thereafter. As Sheikh Abdullah had been released from the prison, he too was present supporting the Accession of the State of J&K with India. Hence continuation by Pakistan of any territory of the state of J&K became the illegal holding of the territory of India. Pakistan thus has no case at all and how they still continue to hold a portion of the territory of India is the only question that needs to be understood.

In the state politics of J&K Sheikh Abdullah was heading a local political party, THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE replacing the Muslim Conference. However the Muslim conference was not totally liquidated but continued to promote the interests of the Muslim community in J&K. The National Conference was originally created with an idea to be secular. Sheikh Mohd headed it. Abdullah and for this reason he came closer to Pt Nehru of the Indian National Congress. It dominated by Mahatma Gandhi, Jawahar Lal Nehru and Acharya Kriplani. Both Dr. B R Ambedkar and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel saw through the evil plan of Abdullah attempting to bring about finally a sovereign J&K state under his own fiefdom. However no such legal provision or liberty was available to any princely state when the sub-continent of India was divided into India and Pakistan on 15th Aug, 1947 to disregard the 3rd June 1947 Mountbatten pan of princely states coming into being as independent state. The only criterion was to examine the contiguity of the borders of the states with India or Pakistan.

While there was no problems in the matters of Bahawalpur, for Pakistan and for Bikaner and Jaisalmer for India, the Hindu ruler of Jodhpur state tried to feel the reaction of Jinnah who was the Governor General of Pakistan. This case becomes important because no one has even quoted this illustration in favour of India and against the Muslim state of Pakistan because it is now a fat of history that Jinnah offered to the Hindu ruler of Jodhpur a blank cheque to dictate any terms of his proposal accession to Pakistan although Pakistan itself was created on the ground of majority population of that area that constituted of Muslims. Thus vanished the sincerity of his famous Two-Nation Theory of Hindus and Muslims in India being two different nations? There also was no legal provision of independence available to any ruler of the state even under the earlier Govt of India act 1935 which held a path for the princely ruler to join into the Federation of India as and when India became free.

It was intended to oust the Hindu maharaja of J&K whose major population comprised of the Muslims. One may not forget that the Jammu region of the state has majority Hindu population and Ladakh region of the state has Buddhist population in majority. Gilgit and Kargil areas are close to the actual border of J&K with Pakistan with mixed population of Kashmiri natives and Punjabi speaking population of Jehlum region in Pakistan. Due to the partition of the country, many Hindus from Rawalpindi and Jehlum area had crossed over into J&K thinking that they could be better protected in there which was under the control of Hindu Maharaja Hari Singh. Another point of vital interest is that it was once again the Jinnah who toyed with the Hindu ruler of Jodhpur state in Rajasthan and had offered to him a blank cheque to fill on condition that he would join Pakistan. A proposal of exchange of total hindu/muslim population in the two countries had been mooted by Dr B R Ambedkar, Raja Gopalachari, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel and Jinnah was rejected by Nehru, on being goaded by Gandhiji.

The final Radcliff award of dividing the sub-continent came into being late in time than what would have been material for the Maharaja of J&K to take his final decision. India & Pakistan were formalized as Dominion states on 15th August 1947 but the ruler of J&K waited till he could appreciate the effect of his state's geographical connection through a road joining Jammu & Pathankot. In the N in the course of its debates on Kashmir, Sir Mohd Zaffarulla Khan, the Pakistani Foreign Minister admitted that the Pakistani regular troops were involved in helping the invasion of J&K. On accession the territory of J&K and its borders became India, it became the duty of the Govt of India to protect her own borders. Hence India is legally & jurisdically justified in sending her troops and save the Srinagar Valley.

It is this background that requires to be publicized for world knowledge. The entire matter could have been taken to the world court at Hague which is another UN organ from whom a judicial declaration could have been asked for if as per International Law has not the territory of J&K become the territory of India. Any attack on its territory must mean as an attack on India. All arguments to the contrary must be abandoned and the hasty complaint made by Nehru on the persuasion of Lord Mountbatten to the UN must be now withdrawn to silence for all time to come any residual controversy in any form. Three military wars have been fought and won by the soldiers of India in the battlefield. What was won through the blood of India soldiers was regretfully lost by India's statesmen like Nehru and Abdullah and later by Indira Gandhi, who fell into the trap of Bhutto and released 93000 Pakistani Captives. Leaving everything else aside including reference to the UN and its resolutions on the issue of J&K it is completely proven that "Pakistan has no case in Kashmir, but for the mess created by Nehru & Abdullah".
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements