Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
"The historian as mischief-maker"

"The historian as mischief-maker"

Author: Krishen Kak
Publication: www.vigilonline.com
Date: May 17, 2004
URL: http://www.vigilonline.com/reference/columns/columnsList.asp?columnist_id=1

Thoughts on issues of current interest [my comments - as an Indian citizen - within square brackets], including instances of some double standards of our public figures, especially in the construction of Indian identity (all those Macaulayan myths, and the hypocrisy that is Nehruvian secularism).

[On NDTV recently, Rajdeep Sardesai passed a gibe at MM Joshi losing the election, that Joshi could now think about his re-writing of history books. Yet, only a little while earlier, Sardesai had passed without comment Sitaram Yechury's openly-stated priority of re-rewriting history.

Communist leaders the world over are skilled at dissembling and at double standards (dachas for themselves along the Black Sea - or the equivalent in Salt Lake City - and cramped tenements for the teeming proles). The treacherous foreign loyalty of the Indian communist leaders is no secret (did not the current ruling dispensation in WB profess a pro-Chinese stand in the Sino-Indian war?), nor is their duplicity over secularism (remember the current WB CM announcing encouragement to madrassas, that he'd earlier described as "anti-national" - http://www.indianexpress.com/ie20020212/top5.html - all for the sake of Muslim support); over disinvestment ("Reds under beds", editorial, The Pioneer, May 15, 2004), and over electoral strategy (The Election Commission would not allow a film on Godhra because it "offended decency, glorified violence and offended religious susceptibilities" (The Hindu, May 17, 2004) but, in West Bengal, the Marxists "played videotapes on Gujarat till late into the nights.....The Muslim dominated regions were literally inundated by cassettes on Gujarat.....which the CPI(M) tactfully played out night and day..." (Saugar Sengupta, "Bengal's Joan of Arc slayed", The Pioneer, May 16, 2004). And, of course, their double standards over history]

The Pioneer, May 17, 2004, editorial

"Past imperfect"

"Samudragupta alias Chandragupta was the greatest ruler of the Gupta dynasty". "Fa-Hein came to India, saw Ashoka's and Gupta palaces and the caves of Ellora" (which means he lived at least 1,400 years). "The people of ancient India did not know how to read and write". "Paper and silk came to India via (sic) Muslim invaders."

These are just samples from a "history" textbook currently in circulation among Class VI students of West Bengal's state school system. No "saffronisation" of history has yet been possible in that "secular" utopia. So millions of Bengalis are growing up learning utter falsehoods, whether arising from the poor scholarship of textbook writers approved by the Marxist government, or, the deliberate acts of omission dictated by the Shuddho-Asuddho circular of 1989 which clearly laid down a policy of misrepresenting the past. Quite the same spirit guided the authors on the permanent panel of NCERT for 30 years preceding the coming of the NDA Government to power.

A whole generation of Indians grew up in the "knowledge" that the Aryans came to India from some other country; that the Somnath temple sacking by Mahmud of Ghazni was only an economic crime; Guru Teg Bahadur was an ordinary criminal who got his just desserts from Aurangzeb and that the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan was caused by the United States and Pakistan. Of course, there was no mention of Stalin's great crimes, the Prague Spring didn't happen and, what is more, books in circulation till 1999 scarcely breathed a word about the fall of communism.

To the Leftists, school book history is about mind control. Ninety-nine per cent of Indians learn all the history they can while in school. So whatever is drilled into pre-16'ers stick for life and the dream of an eventual "revolution" is kept alive.

[The eagerness of the communists to write their version of history as the history is understandable. Nehru encouraged and benevolently presided over what the editorial elsewhere calls "academic gangsters", and some of whom Arun Shourie cuttingly exposes as "Eminent Historians" (ASA, 1998). The consequences for Indians of this gangsterism are summed up by Michel Danino at http:// www.bharatvani.org/michel_danino/colonization.html .......]

Almost all Indian history taught today in our schools and universities has been written by Western scholars, or by "native historians who [have] taken over the views of the colonial masters," in the words of Prof. Klostermaier of Canada's University of Manitoba. All of India's historical tradition, all ancient records are simply brushed aside as so much fancy so as to satisfy the Western dictum that "Indians have no sense of history." Indian tradition never said anything about mysterious Aryans invading the subcontinent from the Northwest, but since nineteenth-century European scholars decided so, our children still today have to learn by rote this invention now rejected by most archaeologists ; South Indian tradition said nothing about the Dravidians coming from the North, driven southward by the naughty Aryans, but again that shall be stuffed into young brains. No Indian scholar or grammar or tradition ever claimed that Sanskrit and Tamil languages were great rivals belonging to wholly separate families, but this shall be taught at school in deference to Western linguists or to our own "Dravidian" activists. The real facts of the destruction wreaked in India by Muslim invaders and also by some Christian missionaries must be kept outside textbooks and curricula, since they contradict the "tolerant" and "liberating" image that Islam and Christianity have been projecting for themselves. Even the freedom movement is not spared : as the great historian R. C. Majumdar and others have shown, no serious, objective criticism of Mahatma Gandhi or the Indian National Congress is allowed, and the role of other important leaders is systematically belittled or erased.

The result is that the Sardesais of this world sneer at attempts to correct these gross distortions; they are simply not prepared to look at empirical evidence to the contrary, they have closed minds - see, for example, http://india.indymedia.org/en/2003/02/3494.shtml - and mockingly open mouths.

Take the Aryan Invasion Theory, on which the academic gangsters built their divisive construction of Indian identity. This theory is still, as The Pioneer notes, taught to students in West Bengal. It is also taught by by Delhi's prestigious Lady Shri Ram College to its History Honours students.

And yet there is not one shred of empirical evidence, not one pottery shard, to support it. The theory was a colonial construction used to divide and rule and to kill millions of people. The evidence is all there - chapter and verse - in NS Rajaram's very readable "The Politics of History" (1995).

Or if this is heavy stuff for sound-byters like Rajdeep Sardesai, let him and Prannoy Roy take a look at a very easily-read booklet, David Frawley's "The Myth of the Aryan Invasion of India" (2001).

Or, on a contemporary issue, Koenraad Elst's neatly factual "Ayodhya: The Case Against the Temple" (2002).

As Swapan Dasgupta notes, "History suggests that Indian Communists have made the hijacking of political authority a skill. Between 1969 and 1977, Indira Gandhi pursued the material interests of her family and allowed the Left to play havoc with the economy and education. A repetition of the scenario cannot be ruled out" (No mandate for a Left hijack", The Pioneer, May 16, 2004).

The communists have made no secret of their intention to expand their West Bengal all over India. Earlier this morning, a self-professed "Marxian" described to me West Bengal as an "an unfree society".

To repeat from The Pioneer: "To the Leftists, school book history is about mind control. Ninety-nine per cent of Indians learn all the history they can while in school. So whatever is drilled into pre-16'ers stick for life and the dream of an eventual "revolution" is kept alive." This is the writing of our history at its worst mischief-making - and our Rajdeep Sardesais and NDTV gloat!

The title of this offering is from David Cannadine, "History In Our Time", (Penguin, 2000:285). The Rajaram, Elst and Frawley are all available from Voice of India, 2/18 Ansari Road, New Delhi 110002, tel. 2327-8034, fax 2328-2047].
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements