Author: Rajeev Srinivasan
Publication: Rediff on Net
Date: May 19, 2004
URL: http://us.rediff.com/news/2004/may/20rajeev.htm
I must admit that the taste of humble
pie eaten cold is particularly bracing to the soul. I was wrong; no, I
was comprehensively wrong about the outcome of Election 2004. Fortunately,
every other member of the chatterati, including the die-hard Old Left windbags
who are now preening, also had accepted as a fait accompli the return of
the NDA to power. But that's cold comfort.
I had certainly expected the NDA
to scrape through with perhaps a reduced margin. The magnitude of the setback
has astonished and utterly saddened me, for this has come at an extremely
inopportune time, for three reasons: the economic angle, foreign affairs/national
security, and the idea of India. This is the mother of all missed opportunities.
But there is no time to waste on
mourning. I remember Edward Kennedy's brilliant speech conceding defeat
at the Democratic Convention in 1980: 'For me, a few hours ago, this campaign
came to an end. For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work
goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never
die.'
Yes, the hope still lives, and the
dream shall never die. For all of us -- and I have been getting anguished
e-mails from many -- need to keep fighting the good fight. We who care
about that great nation, we who understand the greatness of that civiliSation,
we whose hearts are as one, like red earth and pouring rain, with the very
soil of that Holy Land. To paraphrase Martin Luther King, we have a dream,
and in the end, we shall overcome.
For all of us who have this dream,
this is but a temporary setback; for we will eventually build that city
on a hill, our millennial just society, much like what we had in ages past
before invasions laid waste to the land. The enigmatic spirit of the Indus-Sarasvati
civiliSation, the oldest, the largest in area of all classical civiliSations,
the most peaceful, the most creative, lives on as a flame in our hearts.
This civilisation has lasted for millennia because it has evolved organically
with the land, and it has so much to offer to all of us.
Swami Vivekananda once said that
if he but a hundred committed youths, he would work miracles: and those
committed youths exist now, both in India and in the Diaspora, and they
will never give up.
Yet, I look back at history and
wonder why India seems so adept at fumbling its future. Is it because of
Kali Yuga that India persistently shoots itself in the foot? Although there
is a difference in scale and impact, I am forced to think of opportunities
lost when India's wise men and women did not think of building the Great
Wall of India to keep out the barbarians; when Prithviraj Chauhan let a
defeated Mahmud Ghori go free; when Indians allowed Dara Shikoh to be murdered
by Aurangazeb; when Indian fought fellow-Indian and permitted the wily
European to bleed the nation dry.
And more recently when Indians allowed
themselves to be brainwashed by an appalling and eminently stupid Stalinist
ideology that prevented the nation from reaching the heights it could so
easily have scaled. In 1997, as the Asian meltdown happened, India went
into political instability mode, instead of standing firm as a safe harbor
for any stray capital fleeing risk in Southeast and East Asia.
In 2004, India has been standing
on the brink of a historic moment, for, finally, the world at large has
begun to realize that far from being a land of poverty, India is a land
blessed with a civilisational inheritance of intellectual power, and all
the potential to be a leader.
Alas, that damned word, potential.
As some wit once said of Brazil, that country is forever condemned to have
potential. Is India condemned, similarly, to always be the country about
which one has to say, 'if only.'? I hope not, but in the aftermath of the
election results, I wonder. If only Indians had stayed the course in economics
that the NDA followed! If only Indians had showed the world that they have
their act together! The optimistic Goldman Sachs projections could have
been more than met if only.
For we stand at the cusp of a new
economic cycle and realignment. Despite the problems America is facing
in Iraq, the US economy is beginning to show signs of growth, so much so
that the Federal Reserve is signaling an imminent rise in interest rates
to clamp down on inflation. This locomotive economy may be back on track.
Meanwhile, an overheated China is likely to go in for a hard landing, throwing
neighboring Asian economies into turmoil, with the singular exception of
India whose exposure to China is minimal.
Given the way India has shone over
the last year or two, with its dramatic across-the-board growth, the eminently
successful divestment activity, the large investment in high-leverage infrastructure
like highways, and the movement of service jobs to India, foreign institutional
investment and foreign direct investment had perked up. Coupled with this,
and the strong showing in manufacturing sectors where India had almost
been written off, India was really looking up.
All the momentum is lost now with
the Congress coming back into power, along with assorted hangers-on from
the self-proclaimed 'secular', 'progressive' fringe parties. Unbridled
Nehruvian Stalinism and the License Raj will reappear, along with dynasty
sycophancy and groupthink. In particular, the ideologues of the Old Left
will pack all the institutions of the State with their cronies, so that
their impact can last for a long time.
All the achievements of the last
few years will be reversed. Forecasting this, foreign institutional money
has been deserting India in droves recently; these people are not sentimental,
and they can read the writing on the wall: confusion, populism, subsidies,
infighting, disaster. I wrote this before the massive drops on Dalal Street,
which have now wiped out several billion dollars: losers include the small
investor, as well as the Government of India, as public sector units stocks
took a particular beating.
What is likely to happen now is
the following: larceny on a large-scale by a motley crew consisting of
everyone from uncouth China-loving Old Leftists to agents of Semitic religious
extremists to Judases accepting foreign money to spike India's missile
and space programs. They will ruin the economy, plenty of capital will
flee the country and end up in numbered overseas accounts, and within about
two years, the rascals will be fighting amongst themselves so badly that
there will be another general election. In other words, the very antithesis
of a stable, purposeful plan for growth.
There are a number of things that
India needs now to continue on a growth path: continued privatisation;
labor reforms; fiscal discipline via reducing populist subsidies and the
pension burden; measures to attract FDI into several sectors like telecom,
power, aviation, ports, roads, insurance and retail; a major focus on agriculture,
treating it as a priority sector. Not one of them is likely to proceed
with the Marxists hanging over the economy like so many succubi.
Interestingly, these same Maxists
will never accept that their glittering China is beginning to look shaky,
because of the problems with the banking system. They are attempting to
cut down on rampant over-investment in unproductive sectors, and their
growth rate will necessarily come down. Analysts are voicing their concerns:
here are some links thanks to readers Dinesh and Ram, from the Economic
Times, 'India Eclipses China as Asia's Star', from the Boston Globe, 'A
Democratic India is overtaking China', from the Financial Times 'India
Emerges the Star of Asia: Democracy and Growth', Stratfor, 'Euphoria, Meltdown
and China's Economy.' This is partly why India has had a golden opportunity
to outshine arch-foe China which is likely to fumble shortly.
And then the Indian voter goes and
does this. Vinaasha kale vipareetha buddhi, I suppose. Why, I don't know.
There may be complex answers, but all I can think of is anti-incumbency
and the lack of an overriding supra-ordinate issue such as an external
enemy. Since I don't understand the complexities of political life in North
India, I tend to focus on the South, and there it appears to be simple
anti-incumbency.
Consider:
* Kerala, the ruling Congress lost
every seat in the Lok Sabha election. The Marxists swept 18 out of 20 seats,
and the NDA got one.
* Tamil Nadu, the ruling AIADMK
lost every seat in the Lok Sabha election.
* Andhra Pradesh, the ruling TDP
lost all but five seats in the Lok Sabha election, and lost power in the
state election.
* Karnataka, the ruling Congress
lost a majority of the seats in the Lok Sabha election, and lost power
in the state election.
Similarly, in several other states
where the incumbent government has been in power for some time, the vote
was against them, except perhaps in Bihar and West Bengal, which are special
cases because of general breakdown in governance in the former and cadre-based
entrenchment of Marxists in the latter. There is the damning comment made
by someone about a democracy bringing Stalinists to power: 'One man, one
vote, one time.' Yes, you get to vote just that once, you will not have
that troublesome chore ever again.
The impact on national security
and foreign affairs of a Congress-Marxist government is rather frightening,
especially if you are a nationalist. I found it quite instructive to read
the editorials in the Western media. There was plenty of gloating about
the fact that the white woman, darling of the West, had beaten the hated
'Hindu nationalists.' The New York Times euologised Atal Bihari Vajpayee,
but found fault with him for the nuclear tests. The Guardian was happy
that the NDA with its 'nationalism and divisiveness' was out.
This gives an indication of the
West's calculations. The fact that the NDA had dared to stand up to their
pressure on the nuclear issue is considered unforgivable. They expect the
Congress to be far more susceptible to pressure than the NDA. The West
cannot accept a nationalistic India, for that India would challenge them
in every possible way sooner or later. They have continually contained
India: for instance using Pakistan and China to box the country into a
'South Asia' ghetto.
The West -- which has assiduously
supported the Nehru Dynasty in the recent past -- is quite certain that
it will be able to influence them. They are expecting a volte-face from
the shrill anti- Western Nehruvian rhetoric of the past. It is not entirely
clear what makes the West so certain of this change of heart, and there
may be a lot behind the scenes that we shall never know. But they are certain
that they don't want a Hindu nationalistic bunch running India.
And that leads to the idea of India.
There is an India of the imagination, the once and future India, the one
that we have caught a few glimpses of in the recent past, the one that
has suddenly appeared on the scene as an object of Western fear and concern,
based on its intellectual capability. This is the idea of India that the
nationalists share.
This is the India of the ages, the
one that inspired a generation of freedom fighters to sacrifice everything;
the India that in both its spiritual and intellectual achievements, is
by far the greatest civilisation that has ever existed. This India has
lain hidden under the detritus of a millennium of degradation, but its
rhythms have survived in the hearts and minds and habits of its children.
It survives in our remarkable acceptance of pluralism, in our willingness
to question, in our openness to ideas from anywhere.
This India survives in the fact
that the great religions that have come out of India are the only ones
that are truly inclusive. It survives in such mundane matters as the fact
if you climb in an auto anywhere in India, and the driver is a Hindu, his
dashboard will have icons honoring Hindu deities, as well as Christian
and Muslim objects; the reverse is never true. In the long run, this spirit
of pluralism and respect for others will remain; and that deserves to survive.
This is the India over which European
colonists carefully constructed a façade, claiming as theirs everything
that came out of the genius of this nation: including our myths, our science,
our astronomy, our mathematics. And in return they manufactured a history
of India as a slave nation. The Nehruvian Stalinists and Marxists, for
their own reasons, perpetuated this abominable lie, convincing large numbers
of Indians that their nation and civilisation were worthless, echoing Macaulay's
ignorant prejudices.
One of the most important things
that the NDA managed to do was to challenge this conventional wisdom, even
though Macalay's spiritual children continue to infest the halls of academia.
And the process is about to begin again: recent reports quote one Eduardo
Faleiro, a putative education minister in the Congress-Marxist coalition
government, who wants to bring back Macaulayite and Marxist fabrications.
For there is no better way to enslave a population than through mis- education,
as in the brainwashed, who are Indian only in color, but enslaved shadows
of foreigners in their hearts.
The most obvious attack on the idea
of India has been the attempt to install Sonia Gandhi, a white woman with
no particular accomplishment to her name, as the prime minister. As I write
this, there is an uproar amongst various sections of the people against
her elevation to this post - - demonstrations, petitions and legal challenges.
There is also a well-orchestrated charade at her residence. She ruled herself
out of contention, and 'distraught' Congress workers urged her to assume
the position. I hope that some politicians will suddenly discover a backbone.
Hope springs eternal.
Of course, the idea of India would
survive a white woman becoming prime minister, but it would be damaged.
It will take Indians much longer to fight the uphill battle for dignity.
And I know -- and I speak for quite a few Indians -- that I would be embarrassed
that India had to outsource its governance to a foreigner, and that too
one with embarrassingly few qualifications. Indians would be laughed at,
and deservedly so.
It is this idea of India, and a
certain national pride (fortunately far removed from the jingoism prevalent
in the US or Europe or China) that make it difficult for me to swallow
the insult of a white foreigner ruling the nation. The Christian colonialists
were even more destructive than the Muslims, and that's saying a lot. But
at least the Muslims planned to stay, whereas the Christians intend only
to loot. And loot they did: I have not made further progress with my analysis
of white thievery, but the figure of $10 trillion is clearly not far off
the mark.
From all these perspectives, the
current dispensation of a Congress-led government supported by Marxists
is a disaster for the nation. But the dream shall live on. We have to fight
the good fight, not for ourselves, but for all those millions whose lives
will improve if and only if a confident India boldly goes forth and claims
its place at the high table. No shrinking, no inferiority complex, no aggression
either, Indians just need to know that they deserve and can demand the
best.
To that just society of our imagined
India, I raise a toast; and we shall live to fight for it another day.
Today's debacle is merely the first step towards a victory. Nothing concentrates
the mind better than a disaster.
