Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
An Islamist Apology

An Islamist Apology

Author: Daniel Pipes
Publication: New York Sun
Date: July 19, 2005

Something possibly unprecedented has occurred in the battle with radical  Islam. A leading Islamist organization has retracted its slurs against  me and issued a public apology. This offers a small but important step  in blocking the advance of Islamic extremism.

The imbroglio began more than two years ago, when President Bush  nominated me for a position in the federal government. Leftists and  Islamists opposed my appointment; one tactic they used was to try to get  me to say things that would get me into trouble. And so it was that I  was asked in April 2003 if I condoned the internment of  Japanese-Americans during World War II. I avoided the question, saying I  lacked the knowledge to reply.

My curiosity was roused, though, so I read Michelle Malkin's book, In  Defense of Internment (Regnery) and wrote about it in late 2004,  concluding that given what was known (and not known) in the early 1940s,  FDR's internment decision was "correct and sensible."

Juan Cole of the University of Michigan seized upon this assessment and  distorted it, alleging that I have "fond visions of rounding up Muslim  Americans and putting them in concentration camps." To this inaccuracy,  I immediately replied: "I am not calling for the internment of Muslims.  I am calling for an ideological war on radical Islam and the  understanding that Islamists are our enemy. I see anti-Islamist Muslims  as critical to the war on radical Islam and far from wanting them  interned, see their active participation as critical to winning the  conflict."

But the cat was out of the bag. Now, 350 websites have repeated the  falsehood that I want American Muslims in concentration camps. A cartoon  even appeared in Islamist publications that has a caricature of me  advocating "Muslim internment camps in the USA (the sooner the better)."

From endorsing concentration camps, it was but a short step to  portraying me as an advocate of mass murder. Wahida Valiante of the  Canadian Islamic Congress, an Ontario-based group, on April 29, 2005,  wrote in her organization's weekly bulletin that I am a follower of  Hitler, that I use the tactics of Hitler, and that I want "to ethnically  cleanse America of its Muslim presence."

Did I really need to point out that this representation of me is, in the  words of a National Post editorial, "a vicious calumny that Ms. Valiante  plucked from thin air"? Must I insist that I really do execrate Hitler?  Aver my horror of genocide? Protest that I never espoused expelling or  murdering Muslim Americans?

I thought not. Rather than take these demeaning and surely futile steps,  I took a different route. Backed by the Heenan Blaikie law firm of  Toronto and the CanWest Global Communications Corporation, Stan Fisher  of Heenan Blaikie sent a libel notice in early May to Ms. Valiante, the  CIC, and the CIC's chairman, Mohamed Elmasry.

On June 10, the CIC published an apology and retraction: "The Canadian  Islamic Congress and Ms. Valiante apologize without reservation and  retract remarks in the column that suggest that Dr. Daniel Pipes is a  follower of Hitler or that he uses the tactics of Hitler or that he  wants to ethnically cleanse America of its Muslim presence." The CIC  also sent funds to cover my legal expenses and made a donation in my  honor to a Canadian charity.

The CIC's action is, to the best of my knowledge, without precedent.

Western Islamist organizations until now have relentlessly attacked,  successfully extracting apologies from media figures like Paul Harvey  and Mortimer Zuckerman, from businesses like Amazon and Nike, from  pastors, columnists, and even from state politicians, a top U.S.  general, and the president of the United States.

Never before have they apologized for having libeled someone The CIC  retraction breaks the Islamists' spell of privilege and their miasma of  immunity. It establishes, at least in Canada and at present, that  Islamist groups do not have impunity to fabricate lies about their  opponents. The rule of law does prevail and it applies even to them.

For those who fear the growth of radical Islam, this episode offers  encouragement that its forces can be contained and defeated. I hope  others will join me in standing up to the new totalitarianism.
 


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements