Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Where nobody is safe, and nobody talks

Where nobody is safe, and nobody talks

Author: Murtaza Razvi
Publication: The Indian Express
Date: June 2, 2011
URL: http://www.indianexpress.com/news/where-nobody-is-safe-and-nobody-talks/798253/0

Free for all" and "killing fields" are the clichés that best describe Pakistan today. From a former prime minister to a sitting governor and a cabinet minister; from ordinary citizens to journalists to the police and the armed forces, no one is safe here anymore. This is a country at war with itself - and nobody's talking about it, because an all-enveloping cloud of denial is suspended over its skies and refuses to go away. Those who dare talk pay with their lives, like journalist Saleem Shahzad did on Monday.

He was made a horrible example of: abducted, tortured to death and then dumped in a canal to be discovered a day later at a head works downstream. The whole affair remains curiously suspicious indeed. Even the efficiency with which the Punjab police moved to find, identify, process and return the body to his heirs is suspect. Accusations of a more serious nature have since been flying in all directions: such-and-such intelligence or security agency killed him; the ISI is the global favourite in such matters of late, so the consensus falls on the obvious rogues who are believed to have infiltrated the ranks of the formidable spy agency - though religious extremists cannot be ruled out as the perpetrators, either acting on their own or at the behest of the agencies.

The prime minister, like a responsible head of a democratic government, has ordered an inquiry into the gruesome murder of a journalist who had a reputation for courageous reporting, for knowing his subject - terrorism and its military nexus - all too well, routinely ruffling many feathers. He rubbed shoulders with al-Qaeda, the Taliban, the Lashkar-e-Toiba, the Jamaat ud-Dawa and such like insiders; and the ISI had warned him of the danger posed to his life only last year.

What more now is the official enquiry going to reveal? It's all there for anyone to see, in black and white, for the colours here have long gone missing; even spilled blood turns black by the time all is said and done. In a country where government-commissioned Scotland Yard and UN inquiry teams were shunned arrogantly by sitting civil-military officials in the matter of questioning to get to the murderer of Benazir Bhutto, Saleem Shahzad is a mere statistic. Last year, 11 Pakistani journalists were killed in the line of duty. This year again we wait for December for Reporters Without Borders to tell us whether we've improved on last year's figure.

So who are the killers that carry out such cold-blooded assassinations? There's a long list of the accused: political parties, ethnic nationalists and insurgents, foreign and home-grown militants, criminals, the gung-ho amongst the security and intelligence apparatus and ordinary citizens acting on their own to win a place in Paradise (like Governor Salman Taseer's killer). The killing of four Chechens in cold blood by the security agencies in Quetta two weeks ago in broad daylight, with TV cameras capturing the two unarmed men and two women - who showed no signs of resistance and were willing to court arrest - are scenes right out of Wild West flicks. While the Supreme Court has taken suo motu notice of the shooting, you could be certain that no heads would roll. Killing fields, indeed.

And even when you are caught killing red-handed, like the CIA spy Raymond Davis was, the family of the victim is often cajoled into accepting blood money to let the killer walk free, under a very controversial Islamic law. It would be unfair to say that only the likes of Raymond Davis get away under such circumstances. For every Davis caught in years, scores of Pakistanis walk away with murder virtually every day, due to the patent injustice that controversial Islamic laws have unleashed. As for the judiciary which presides over such laws, consider the example of Justice Khalil ur-Rahman Ramday of the Supreme Court - the chief justice's handpicked favourite, whose tenure he got extended last year. In a remarkable statement challenging the attorney general on the recently-passed 18th Amendment to the constitution, he asked a hypothetical question with words to this effect: If tomorrow parliament passes a law declaring our legal system secular, do you expect us to accept that too? What a country, and what a sense of constitutionalism!

The minorities and women are in double jeopardy. A whole set of controversial Islamic laws threatens their very existence. In many cases their testimony is one-half of that of an adult male Muslim, and you need only two adult male Muslims to proceed against a blasphemy accused. One wrong step by a woman or a minority citizen and they've had it. Intolerance to changing the status quo has reached alarming levels. Where threats don't work to silence a whistleblower, abductions and killings do the job.

Little did Jinnah know when he declared before the constituent assembly of Pakistan on August 11, 1947: "In this state of Pakistan, you are free to go to your mosques, your temples and places of worship... religion shall have nothing to do with the business of the state..." Since then, so much has gone wrong with his Pakistan that nothing short of a Gandhi can fix it. Our tragedy is that we were not built to raise Gandhis.

- The writer is an editor with 'Dawn', Karachi


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements