Author: Krishnaprasad
Publication: The Hindu
Date: August 23, 2011
URL: http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/article2386596.ece
"Criminal. A hoax. A malicious joke.
Unbelievable." Whatever be your initial reaction, it's a hard fact of
numbers. Yes, only one out of 518 lawyers who appeared for a written test
conducted by the Karnataka High Court for direct recruitment of district judges
has cleared it.
The results, announced recently, have startled
the legal fraternity, which is wondering whether meritorious and qualified
lawyers are wary of joining judicial service or whether there is a decline
in the quality of lawyers.
The test was conducted in September last to
fill 13 posts of district judge under the Karnataka Judicial Officers (Recruitment)
Rules. Advocates with a minimum of seven years of legal practice were eligible
to apply.
A committee, comprising senior judges of the
High Court, sets the question paper and evaluates the answer scripts.
A candidate, to become eligible for the personality
test (viva-voce), was expected to secure a minimum of 50 per cent (75 marks)
in both the civil and criminal law papers, which had 150 marks each.
However, only 12 candidates secured between
75 and 101 marks in civil law and only one crossed 75 in criminal law.
A few even scored zero, and many secured only
single-digit marks in criminal law.
"Such a poor result is the first in the
recent past as far as I know," remarked a retired High Court judge.
The former Advocate-General, Uday Holla, described
the results as "a sad reflection on the Bar." He, however, said
meritorious graduates, particularly from prominent law schools, might not
be showing interest in joining either the Bar (law practice) or the Bench
(judiciary). They appeared more attracted to corporate jobs.
A few senior lawyers, former Advocates-General,
and a retired High Court judge said the results were a reflection of the knowledge
of lawyers who appeared for the test.
"Younger lawyers are not spending time
on reading after they start practice and this results in a decline in the
standards of legal profession," said a retired High Court judge, while
insisting that the court should also make the examination process completely
transparent, providing the candidates copies of answer scripts.
Additional Advocate-General K.M. Nataraj said
both the Bar and the Bench had to take the results seriously. "The Bar
Council has to take some steps to ensure that good lawyers are motivated to
join subordinate judiciary. We need to relook the process and norms of selection
too."
Bangalore Advocates' Association president
K.N. Putte Gowda said maybe there was lack of preparation among the candidates.
Also, a good number of talented advocates were not keen on joining the judiciary
due to lower promotion opportunities.