Hindu Vivek Kendra
A RESOURCE CENTER FOR THE PROMOTION OF HINDUTVA
   
 
 
«« Back
Pawns in the hands of ISI

Pawns in the hands of ISI

Author: Balbir K Punj
Publication: The Pioneer
Date: July 31, 2011
URL: http://www.dailypioneer.com/357331/Pawns-in-the-hands-of-ISI.html

Unwittingly or otherwise, Left-liberal intellectuals who pose as crusaders of human rights have enjoyed the hospitality of the ISI which violates all rights.

The arrest in Washington, DC by the FBI of Syed Ghulam Nabi Fai whose Kashmiri American Council was being funded by the ISI has taken the lid off the fraud that has been going on for decades in the guise of championing the cause of human rights. It is ironical that some of our opinion-makers among the intelligentsia, while claiming to be fighting for human rights, secularism and democracy, have ended up as pawns in the hands of Pakistan's ISI, a self-professed enemy of these very values.

Do these high profile intellectuals, many of them journalists, attend these seminars just because the organisers also invite a host of other important personalities and pay for the trip? The entire episode of the unmasking of Fai, who used his high-level connections in academia and on Capitol Hill to further his agenda of trying to influence American policy on Jammu & Kashmir, shows how the Government of Pakistan, which denies human rights to its own people, uses foreign human rights organisations as a cover for its nefarious activities.

Fai's has been a prominent face among those advocating human rights for the people of Jammu & Kashmir. He chaired a discussion at the 1993 Vienna conference on human rights which Pakistan had used to try and force an anti-India resolution. Among other activities, he was invited to address the UN Conference on Conflict Resolution where too he propagated the separatist view against India. He presented a paper on the 'Kashmir Round Table' to the European Parliament in 1993.

Among the several platforms he used to air his views in the West were the Washington-based Institute of Peace and the 'Kashmir Round Table' organised by the US Congressional Human Rights Foundation. He has addressed the UN Commission on Human Rights in Geneva, apart from summit meetings of the Organisation of Islamic Conference in Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Morocco, Iran, Qatar and Malaysia.

Fai studied at Aligarh Muslim University and, as an active member of the students' wing of the Jamaat-e-Islami, he had tried to organise a World Muslim Youth Conference. When the Jammu & Kashmir Police sought his arrest, he escaped to Saudi Arabia. Surprisingly despite his background of being involved in separatist activity, Fai would often travel to Jammu & Kashmir. He has two wives - a Kashmiri and a Chinese American Muslim.

L'affaire Fai shows how human rights activism has been hijacked by foreign intelligence organisations and their stooges to sow seeds of distrust against our country and our democracy. More than that, it also demonstrates how many of our peaceniks who participate in candlelight vigils at Wagha border to promote peace between India and Pakistan are unwittingly or otherwise becoming tools in the hands of agents of foreign intelligence services.

The protestations of innocence by those who attended conferences organised by Fai may be genuine, but it ought to remind them of their failure to check the antecedents of foreign organisations that offer all expenses paid invitations to seminars and meetings.

Protests against violations of human rights are no doubt part of the democratic process. But more often than not, these protests are one-sided. For instance, human rights activists were incensed over the arrest and conviction of Maoist ideologue Binayak Sen but have remained silent whenever Maoists have killed security forces personnel in Chhattisgarh and other States. This sort of one-sided human rights activism is common in Jammu & Kashmir, Manipur and other conflict zones where insurgents often kill innocent people and security forces personnel. These human rights activists do not feel compelled to protest against the violence perpetrated by anti-national and divisive forces but are quick to take offence when security forces crack down on foreign-funded and externally-inspired insurgents and their supporters.

When there are protests against activist-author Arundhati Roy for teaming up with separatists like Syed Ali Shah Geelani to abuse not just our security forces but also the Indian State, human rights activists denounce what they describe as interference with the democratic right to protest. Now that the FBI has exposed the people who have been funding Geelani and his ilk, shouldn't Arundhati Roy apologise for keeping the company of ISI's proxies?

Meanwhile, the Government should review the performance of its own intelligence agencies, especially R&AW. How is it that Fai's well-oiled US-based propaganda apparatus escaped their radar for more than two decades? When a former Indian citizen finances so many international conferences, ostensibly for advancing human rights but really for pushing the cause of Pakistan-backed Kashmiri separatists, how is it that our own intelligence agencies fail to spot him and his linkages?

Had the FBI not blown Fai's cover after tracking him over the last few years, this India-born ISI stooge would have carried on with this dubious activities without anybody getting the wiser. The credit for exposing Fai goes to the FBI which also exposed David Coleman Headley and his associate, Tahawwur Hussain Rana, of the Chicago cell of the Lashkar-e-Tayyeba.

The failure of our intelligence agencies to spot Fai and zero in on his patrons raises the question: Are they feeling frustrated over sections of the current dispensation actively wooing those elements who are inimical to India's interests? Are they veering round to the view that it is futile to identify India's enemies because there are powerful individuals who see them not as foes but friends? This dangerous trend could have a debilitating impact on the functioning of our agencies at home and abroad as they are prone to taking their cue from the political leadership.

Hopefully, l'affaire Fai will lead to some amount of rethinking and weakening of those individuals who, like Fai, are working to weaken our nation. They include bleeding heart human rights activists and their mentors, as well as those who provide intellectual legitimacy to violent anti-national activities. The least that is expected is that Left-liberal intellectuals who are permanent fixtures on the global seminar circuit will now onwards check the antecedents of their hosts and find out who is the real sponsor of the event.


Back                          Top

«« Back
 
 
 
  Search Articles
 
  Special Annoucements